Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL811H\s+on\s+AM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL811H\s+on\s+AM\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: ckaine@one.net (Christopher Kaine); Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:22:32 -0500; I am trying to get information concerning running an AL811H amplifier on AM. The manual does NOT include directions/recommendations. TIA Chris Kaine N8JDG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00143.html (6,581 bytes)
2. Fw: [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: nospam4me@juno.com (skipp isaham); Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:37:08 -0800; Hi Chris, - For reasons I'd rather not get into, your simple question is a touchy one for many amps members. - Operation of an amplifier in AM mode should probably be no more than 25% of it's SSB rat; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00145.html (7,899 bytes)
3. [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: R_Davis" <WD8JJA@arrl.net (R_Davis); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:23:34 -0500; This brings up a question I have always had. We are always urged to tune for maximum power out at maximum drive. For SSB, I tune my FL-2100B (you guys already know this has 572B's) with 100 watts dri; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00148.html (9,570 bytes)
4. [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:07:31 -0800; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00155.html (10,842 bytes)
5. [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: R_Davis" <WD8JJA@arrl.net (R_Davis); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:03:39 -0500; @@ Yeaaah - good shot - wpm. Knob all the way to the right. One for you. @@ 800 W out key down after it is tuned up. A0! One for me. this time "big @@ No worries mate. I never, but NEVER key down at; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00161.html (12,539 bytes)
6. [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: R_Davis" <WD8JJA@arrl.net (R_Davis); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:08:54 -0500; ? Max drive for 2, 572Bs is c. 65W. @@ OOPS - I believe that is 65 watts per tube, so at 100 watts drive, each tube gets 50 watts. ? For AM, Yes. Even though the AM carrier is only 25% of PEP, the lo; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00162.html (9,234 bytes)
7. [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:51:32 -0800; unhappy owner, is the set of obvious design deficiencies...including the tiny little (12.7 cfm) cooling fans which move air only across the glass envelopes, and cool nothing else; the horizontal tub; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00164.html (14,195 bytes)
8. [AMPS] AL811H on AM (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:58:43 -0800; ? Approx. 30 - 35W per 811A or 572B. power is / The same. An audio tone produces a discrete RF frequency in a SSB transmitter. / No. Reducing drive and tuning produces a mis-tune = non-linearity. ur; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00165.html (9,343 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]