Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+ALPHA\s+\"SUNSPOT\"\s+SALE\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+ALPHA\s+\"SUNSPOT\"\s+SALE\!\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: sandy@sandy.com (Sandy Meltzer); Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 18:46:05 -0800; I'm posting this for my friends at Alpha... please respond directly to them: -- SAVE! ** ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! ** SAVE! Long after sunset Saturday night, I switched on the xcvr & ALPHA. Before you co; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00050.html (9,190 bytes)
2. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: dpgsrg@hti.net (Dan Gannon, WA5ANF); Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 21:45:24 -0600; It is so sad to see shameless, blatant, and purly commercial SPAM on this list. Please, don't do this again. Thank you. Dan Gannon, WA5ANF -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submiss; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00053.html (8,836 bytes)
3. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner); Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 09:59:36 GMT; _______________________________________________________________ Speak for yourself, Dan. It's list-related, timely and useful. I don't mind it a bit. I only wish it had been a couple of months earlie; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00055.html (8,833 bytes)
4. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 6 Nov 97 05:12:29 -0800; I semi-agree, Bill. [AMPS] should not be like the non-commercial amateur radio bands. - I see fewer trade-offs from advistising on the Internet than I see with advertising in the amateur radio magaz; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00059.html (9,817 bytes)
5. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 09:19:21 +0000; __________________________________________________________ Hi Bill, I had no idea it was OK to advertise or do commercial marketing on this list. I'll tell Ameritron, Command, and QRO the policy has; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00062.html (9,314 bytes)
6. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL); Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 07:39:33 -0500; To all: The advertising of gear doesn't bother me. What bothers me is to have the people involved in "peeing contests" be compelled to stay OFF the "reply to all" and "CC" keys. This is a thoughless; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00066.html (10,833 bytes)
7. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 6 Nov 97 11:16:26 -0800; If the info being presented is of interest to some of the people on this mailing-list, it is not "spam", Mr. Rauch. However, an ad that goes too far, is quite likely to be an unadvertisement. Rich--; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00072.html (9,596 bytes)
8. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner); Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 02:10:08 GMT; On Thu, 6 Nov 1997 09:19:21 +0000, w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net wrote: _______________________________________________________________ I had no idea either. I still don't -- I'm not the list b; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00077.html (10,084 bytes)
9. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: sawyers@inav.net (Steve Sawyers n0yvy); Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 21:02:53 -0600; My delete key works on all this follow on as well as the original message. I usually hit delete based on the subject or by the time I am half way across the first line. My modem is faster than I can; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00081.html (8,822 bytes)
10. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 00:35:46 +0000; Hi Lee, Amen. Not only do we often get the reply on the reflector, we also get one via e-mail. Absolutely. That's why I made an off-line suggestion to Sandy that his message was in poor taste. I was; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00085.html (9,590 bytes)
11. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: morel@shani.net (morel); Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 08:31:42 +-200; Tom, I'll be happy to see feedbacks and interesting contributions from all these manufacturers. 73 de Morel, 4X1AD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00087.html (8,519 bytes)
12. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: km3g@cts.com (Lane C. Zeitler); Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 22:44:54 -0800; And mine also. Lane KM3G -- To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Proble; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00089.html (9,322 bytes)
13. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 6 Nov 97 23:11:07 -0800; ...snip... It depends on the nature of the e-mail. There are exceptions: Threats and double-dealing should be brought to public attention. I unhesitatingly repost such e-mail. Rich-- R. L. Measures,; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00090.html (8,902 bytes)
14. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 6 Nov 97 23:26:23 -0800; Mine too, Lane and Sandy. Rich-- To: <amps@contesting.com> R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative req; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00091.html (10,367 bytes)
15. [AMPS] ALPHA "SUNSPOT" SALE! (score: 1): Author: perring@infocom.net (Bob Perring); Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 09:01:28 -0600; Just didn'y want to be the only one out here not posting a message to the group under this title. 73, Bob -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Adminis; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00093.html (8,130 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]