Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Alpha\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:29:17 -0500
The key is to have a gap that always breaks down at less voltage than the switch. Not doing that is just Goofy. (sorry Mini) 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00105.html (7,411 bytes)

2. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:35:47 -0500
Hi Mike, If the SB-220 did suffer damage, it would have been from operating frequency voltages. If a VHF parasitic would ever NOT be bypassed very well right at the input of the the tank, the amplifi
/archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00098.html (8,996 bytes)

3. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: apollo_six@btinternet.com (paul)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:23:58 +0000
In this case it's much more likely to be a mismatch causing a high voltage arc. Did something similar to my ATU last week drawing a 2 inch arc, no marks on the switch however - it was a real ceramic
/archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00104.html (12,808 bytes)

4. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 06:06:26 -0800
I have an old Ten-Tec 4229 tuner that is on its second ceramic wafer switch (this is the switch used to change the L-network configuration from Hi-Z step down to Lo-Z step up). I destroyed the origin
/archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00087.html (11,328 bytes)

5. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 22:46:29 +0000
1-01-01 17.14, skrev measures p&aring; 2@vc.net f&ouml;ljande: The reason for switch arcing is that too many beers made the operator turn the bandswitch during tune-up. Prosit de Hans SM5KI -- FAQ on
/archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00021.html (9,984 bytes)

6. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:14:08 -0800
? according to Mr. Rauch, he has not completed Electronics 101. cheers, Dave. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps
/archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00013.html (9,116 bytes)

7. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer)
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:24:07 -0500
I don't know Mike. The teachers in my part of the country probably wouldn't have any problem affording a Henry 8K ;>) Mike(y) W3SLK -- Original Message -- From: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com> To: Ha
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00379.html (15,367 bytes)

8. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:19:08 -0800
smoke - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Pro
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00365.html (8,714 bytes)

9. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:19:07 -0800
When are You going to take EL-101, Mr. Rauch.? Tom plays the Sarcasm Card. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@co
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00366.html (8,762 bytes)

10. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:50:28 -0500
Hi Dave, I've said it many many times, as have many other people. As a matter of fact I said it in the post where you said I didn't say it. Despite that, I'll repeat it again. Band switches primarily
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00364.html (8,862 bytes)

11. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: k1ta@contesting.com (Bob Marston)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 17:06:38 -0800
Before I respond to your post a personal anecdote is in order. Way back when I was in High School when the option of electives came up I selected Electricity-Electronics. In the school district I was
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00361.html (10,875 bytes)

12. [AMPS] alpha (score: 1)
Author: wa4oyh@mindspring.com (Bill Nowicki (WA4OYH))
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 17:54:47 -0500
Once I built, but now I am almost blind. Give me my Alpha or what ever. Regards, Bill WA4OYH Having fun with Ham Radio! PS I don't climb towers eather. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/am
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00359.html (7,732 bytes)

13. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 17:40:15 EST
in Tom, Since you are not the average ham, what, in your humble opinion, is the cause of bandswitch arcing ???????? You seem to have eliminated all the things that DON'T cause arcs, what is the real
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00358.html (9,682 bytes)

14. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 21:47:50 +0000
0-12-29 18.59, skrev Bob Marston p&aring; k1ta@contesting.com f&ouml;ljande: There is a big difference when you build your own amp: most hams have not the knowledge and testing equipment to check the
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00354.html (11,714 bytes)

15. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:24:11 -0800
Hi All, It seems to me that all this controversy boils down the classic build or buy decision that is made in engineering all the time. Say a newbie is a doctor or lawyer with a lot of discretionary
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00357.html (14,454 bytes)

16. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 15:57:03 -0500
I thought you were the one who said everyone was ill informed and lazy. I was just pointing out your post proves it, since you believe in something that anyone with a good basic skill would find ful
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00355.html (8,486 bytes)

17. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 15:57:03 -0500
Hi Paul, aren't enough I find that odd, since most of the "comprehensive information" is really just hand-waving and technical baffle-gab. To me it illustrates a problem when people believe such nons
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00356.html (9,468 bytes)

18. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: wb4mnf@atl.org (Bob Duckworth)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 20:35:19 -0000
sri, wrong list -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00363.html (7,842 bytes)

19. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: wb4mnf@atl.org (Bob Duckworth)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 20:33:32 -0000
monkey monkey monkey lemur monkey monkey wood chip -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: ow
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00362.html (7,964 bytes)

20. [AMPS] Alpha (score: 1)
Author: apollo_six@btinternet.com (paul)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 19:54:30 +0000
Seems Rich Measures pictures and comprehensive information aren't enough for some people, but then Tom Rauch didn't have to tell me - I formed my own opinion! Paul -- To try and not succeed is better
/archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00353.html (9,039 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]


This search system is powered by Namazu