Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amateur\s+amps\s+on\s+11\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amateur\s+amps\s+on\s+11\s+meters\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: w4th@webtv.net (Tom Hix W4TH); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 12:03:57 -0500 (CDT); There have been several messages lately about amps designed for amateur use being used on 11 meters. In my humble opinion, I think it will be hard to get the legitimate manufactures of amateur amps t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00488.html (11,542 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: superiorwavelength@prodigy.net (G SEVEN); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:52:41 -0700; Along the same lines I believe any efforts regarding this is work done in vane. There is very small percentage of CB operators that actually buy directly from the HF linear manufactures or dealers. M; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00491.html (13,927 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT); Thanks for posting these links Tom. I had no idea this idiots had taken this so far. This certainly raises a lot of issues: biological effects of high intensity EM radiation, illegality, interference; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00492.html (14,739 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:18:23 +0200; Excuse me gents, but you US guys seem to be obsessed with CB'ers running excessive power and how to prevent that! Focus on cleaning up the HAM bands instead and leave the enforcement of CB rules to t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00495.html (8,567 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:20:09 -0400; Hi Tom, Only fools would enjoy having CB'ers as customers. They are the bottom of the foodchain, and that is a liability for the manufacturer. Even the "most technically astute" on CB seem to be tech; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00496.html (9,297 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:31:09 -0400; 1.) Amateurs use callsigns, so any harmful interference is easily traced to the source. 2.) Legal CB power and legal Amateur power levels are separated by a factor of around a hundred times more or; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00497.html (9,177 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: Wlfuqu00@pop.uky.edu (William Fuqua); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:52:16 -0400; I feel quite differently about this. First of all CB'er/Freebanders frequently interfere with ham bands by either overdriving their amplifiers or having parasitic oscillations that drift up and down; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00499.html (10,111 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:45:16 -0700 (PDT); Peter, Your impressions are somewhat mistaken. Not only do the CBers run excessive and illegal power, they do it by overdriving their gear and thus create spurious emissions on various frequencies, i; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00500.html (10,565 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: K0FF@ARRL.NET (K0FF); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:02:03 -0500; If you don't think Mikes comments are true, do a little Web search and look at the pages of pictures that the CB'ers put out. Did you ever see a HAM mobile rig that required 4 alternators in a Diesel; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00502.html (12,098 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: kd4wov@earthlink.net (Tom Tishken KD4WOV(laptop)); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:07:30 -0400; Yes, and many of the stinkin ops on 75 meters running well over the legal limit should be busted and more so, because they know better. not all of those on 75 run huge amount of power but quite a few; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00503.html (10,014 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:06:31 -0400; Peter, It doesn't stop there. First, it is against the law (FCC) to utilize commercially made amplifiers for out-of-band operation. Second, for every 1 sloppy CBer on 11 meters, it cost 5-10 hams res; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00507.html (9,958 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:14:06 -0700; ? As far as I know, the largest CB transmitter ever confiscated ran on 4160v three phase. The FCC testing facility in Virginia was not equipped to power it up. I pretty much agree, Peter. cheers - R; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00511.html (8,777 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: da_kang@hotmail.com (Jeff Wolf); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:02:13 GMT; That 11 meter ground plane is hard to spot in a neighborhood, too. Or the 45 foot 8 element Yagi. And running 1550 watts is still illegal. Tell me this Tom, what is the purpose of running an 8171 on; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00523.html (11,175 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:36:25 -0700; ? This is clearly not the case for the Amateur Service. The FCC gives us a 10% tolerance. The real limit is 1650w. I know of a station inspection that measured more and the operator was not cited. 8; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00529.html (9,300 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Amateur amps on 11 meters (score: 1): Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE R. WICAL); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 06:09:50 -1000; If one gets into a peeing contest with a skunk, it is hard to tell who is who! "DON'T BLAME ME...I VOTED FOR RUDY, THE EX-NAVY SEAL!" "IT TAKES LESS TIME TO DO A THING RIGHT... THAN IT DOES TO EXPLAI; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00531.html (8,295 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]