Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Ameritron\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Ameritron\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] AMERITRON (score: 1): Author: Ku4uk@aol.com (Ku4uk@aol.com); Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:40:44 EDT; Ameritron they are quick on sending parts. They need the money. But the manual are free. If they say they will send things. they should do so. -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00273.html (6,197 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: KB9RPM@centuryinter.net (John Kjos); Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 20:06:23 -0800; Hi,I am planning on getting a second Amp.I currently have a Ameritron AL-80B.I am happy with it.I am considering Ameritron AL-572 or AL-82.Does anyone have any thoughts on either of these?Thank you,; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00161.html (6,850 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner, W7TI); Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 02:00:48 GMT; _______________________________________________________________ My experience with my one and only Ameritron amp tells me the power ratings are for CW and SSB only, not RTTY or any other constant-car; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00195.html (7,332 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 09:20:50 EST; Hi John; I have heard nothing about the AL-572 yet. However the AL-82 has a propensity for big bangs that take out the bandswitch, tube(s), plate choke and the "protection" diode. Why not consider t; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00203.html (7,688 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: KB9RPM@centuryinter.net (John Kjos); Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 22:51:10 -0800; I have a Ameritron AL-80B and have been happy with it.I am planning on getting another Amp for my station.I have been thinking of getting another AL-80B,but am also interested in the New Ameritron AL; /archives//html/Amps/1998-02/msg00042.html (6,588 bytes)
6. [Amps] ameritron (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <dpipes@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:23:25 -0700; Will, That is my thinking and hope <g> all the arcs i saw siince dayone were right in this area.. As i have mentioned too nothing else seems to be burnt or evenlooks hot.. I might try the replacement; /archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00031.html (6,314 bytes)
7. [Amps] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <reidj021@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:48:17 -1000; Well, one issue with them, I have had an AL-572 at their sevice facility in Mississippi since 30 July, date UPS deliverd same to them. So far, not a word back; no acknowlegment, nothing. Guess they a; /archives//html/Amps/2008-08/msg00181.html (6,495 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:11:40 -0400; Why did you send it back?? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2008-08/msg00182.html (7,380 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:17:18 -0400; Like Carl, my question is, why send it back? You have far more patience than I. Do you know for sure they received it? 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing lis; /archives//html/Amps/2008-08/msg00184.html (7,415 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Ameritron (score: 1): Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:23:17 -0700; Squeaky wheel and all, I would be calling them. Mike Well, one issue with them, I have had an AL-572 at their sevice facility in Mississippi since 30 July, date UPS deliverd same to them. So far, not; /archives//html/Amps/2008-08/msg00186.html (7,516 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]