- 1. [AMPS] Ameritron AL-80 upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: gm3woj@talk21.com (Chris Tran GM3WOJ)
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:17:30 +0100
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0014_01BECB9F.BA6E9340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sunday 11th July 1999 H
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00189.html (9,480 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Ameritron AL-80 upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 06:43:17 -0700
- ? As I understand it, the vhf suppressor has not been improved because the designer is convinced that there has never been a case of one that oscillated. // See Figure 15 on my Web site. . If you ar
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00191.html (7,763 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Ameritron AL-80 upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:54:52 -0400
- Hi Chris, I never heard that rumor about early AL-80's, except from Rich Measures. He attributes any failure, no matter what the actual cause, to parasitics. If you feel more comfortable, make mods..
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00203.html (8,912 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Ameritron AL-80 upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:33:20 -0700
- ? Only when there is collateral evidence. The good news is that what appears to be parasite damage in single 3-500Z amplifiers (such as the AL-80 .series and SB-1000) is less common than it is 2, 3-
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00210.html (8,532 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu