Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Ameritron\s+AL80B\:\s+Dynamic\s+ALC\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Ameritron\s+AL80B\:\s+Dynamic\s+ALC\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Ameritron AL80B: Dynamic ALC? (score: 1): Author: grainone@caserta.peoples.it (Vanni Rainone); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 07:32:54 +0300; Ciao to all. I read on the Ameritrons' AL80B technical info that on this Amp is installed a "electronic bias" that is a known circuit and a " Dynamic ALC" that allows "high level, low distortion RF p; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00225.html (7,805 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Ameritron AL80B: Dynamic ALC? (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 97 04:58:27 -0700; ... The designer of the AL80B also says that 500++mA of anode/plate current is ok for a 3-500Z, even though Eimac and Amperex say that the maximum current is 400mA. Who is right? IMO, this would not; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00227.html (7,794 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Ameritron AL80B: Dynamic ALC? (score: 1): Author: grainone@caserta.peoples.it (Vanni Rainone); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 20:04:17 +0300; Probably you are right,Rich, but - I'm very interested to this kind of experimentation; - The increased peak of Anode current could be not so dangerous for short transmit periods. - To increase the a; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00235.html (8,566 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Ameritron AL80B: Dynamic ALC? (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 97 15:45:07 -0700; It is not dangerous, even for long periods, Vanni. IMO, it is not a solution. It is a deception. SSB talk power comes from cathode emissivity and anode supply potential. Rich-- R. L. Measures, 805-3; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00239.html (8,615 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Ameritron AL80B: Dynamic ALC? (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:55:43 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Vince, How much improvement it really makes depends on the ALC response time of your rig, and how you run the rig. Here is what the circuit does. Instead of sampling RF v; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00241.html (9,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]