Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amp\.\s+Bypass\s+SWR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amp\.\s+Bypass\s+SWR\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Amp. Bypass SWR (score: 1): Author: nasfred@1bigred.com (Mike); Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 18:32:48 -0500; Hello Amp. Fans Should the amp. bypass circuit introduce a SWR reading of around 1.3 to 1 at 14 MHz. when a 50 Ohm dummy load is connected to the output of the amp. and a SWR analyzer connected to th; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00199.html (8,139 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Amp. Bypass SWR (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 16:05:29 -0700; If enough stuff is messed up, surely. Most turkeys overload the Cantenna - and overheat the resistor. This causes the resistance to increase. No. You need to cancel the series L in the relays with a; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00201.html (8,511 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Amp. Bypass SWR (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 18:05:05 -0600; Replace the 1/2" flashing with the center conductor from a piece of RG8/U. Ground the RG-58U at BOTH ends. Take another reading and report back. (((73))) Phil, K5PC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00202.html (7,784 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Amp. Bypass SWR (score: 1): Author: realex@flash.net (bob alexander); Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 18:21:21 -0600; Hi Mike, What you are seeing is to be expected. The wiring adds a bit of inductive reactance to the line. I would not bother with it, but if you want to get rid of it, connect a small value cap with; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00203.html (8,962 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]