Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amp\s+Choices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amp\s+Choices\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Amp Choices (score: 1): Author: kpotter@greenepa.net (Ken Potter); Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:59:02 -0400; Pat, A good place to get feedback on amps is on eham.com There are lots of comments on all of the amps that you are considering. Ken Potter WW3KP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Sub; /archives//html/Amps/2000-07/msg00086.html (6,634 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Amp Choices (score: 1): Author: mbrown@shine1.com (Michael Brown); Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:30:32 -0500; I'm no expert when it comes to amps, but a friend of mine bought the AL 572B and didn't care for it at all. I think they finally took it back, and he bought an AL 80B that he was much happier with. I; /archives//html/Amps/2000-07/msg00087.html (7,969 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Amp Choices (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 22:13:53 -0400; The initial AL-572's came with tubes that had chronic problems, even though they were from what was considered a "good" manufacturer. Somewhere around half of brand new tubes failed a hi-pot test at; /archives//html/Amps/2000-07/msg00089.html (7,831 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]