Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amplifier\s+for\s+cw\s+only\-question\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Amplifier\s+for\s+cw\s+only\-question\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Amplifier for cw only-question. (score: 1): Author: owens@atd.ucar.edu (Chip Owens); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:41:14 -0600; If one uses an hf power amplifier for cw operation only is there any good reason to operate it in AB1, AB2, or class B? Wouldn't class C operation yield higher efficiency and actually make QSK operat; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00293.html (7,735 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Amplifier for cw only-question. (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:09:58 -0700; Boy I hope you don?t need a flak jacket. However, I see you must have been reading for a while! I would agree that class C for CW mode is more efficient, that subject just doesn?t come up anymore. As; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00294.html (10,809 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Amplifier for cw only-question. (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 14:54:57 -0700; I recently considered the same issue and settled on AB2 (and I don't even know where my microphone is). I designed my amplifier for 1500 watts out, and efficiency is irrelevant -- I don't hold the ke; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00300.html (8,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]