Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+An\s+Idea\s+for\s+a\s+New\s+Feature\s+\@\s+Dayton\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+An\s+Idea\s+for\s+a\s+New\s+Feature\s+\@\s+Dayton\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:02:32 -0600 (CST); I suggest we get Rich, Carl, and Tom in the middle of Hara Arena in May and let them all duke it out. No words. No Gloves. Mano to Mano. When the shit is cleared ... then the one standing won't have; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00078.html (8,384 bytes)
2. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Apr 97 04:35:28 -0800; No words? No words would be like having an Indianapolis 500 with no fuel. Folks would be quite likely to walk out. Lee: You mentioned bullshit. Do you believe that I have proffered technical bullshi; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00086.html (8,213 bytes)
3. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 08:37:40 -0500; Lee, If I don't have the freedom to correct technical mis-statements in a non-personal way let me know, I'll sign out. I suggest you go back and read the posts, and see who is replying on a technical; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00088.html (8,187 bytes)
4. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 09:21:43 EST; On Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:02:32 -0600 (CST) k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller) writes: You certainly are one Lee! Tom and I have been friends for over 10 years and when we get together at Dayton it is to ho; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00091.html (7,929 bytes)
5. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Apr 97 10:26:26 -0800; --like the 500mA++ current rating for a 3-500Z? I absolutely, positively, 100% (thanks, OJ) agree with Mr. Rauch on this one, Lee. Your going back and reading the posts seems like a fair way that th; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00099.html (8,851 bytes)
6. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Apr 97 11:24:49 -0800; and Are you talking about what you appreciate, or what the other folks appreciate, Paul? I see plenty of folks putting copies of the Enquirer and the Globe into their shopping carts at the Lucky Mar; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00102.html (9,543 bytes)
7. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: jwatson@mail.cde.com (John Watson); Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 14:42:17 -0500; Actually Rich, as the one that started this diatribe, by my asking a question about the SB1000 over a week ago, I think in my own opinion that your attitude, demeanor, and being overly eager to disag; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00104.html (7,867 bytes)
8. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Apr 97 14:23:27 -0800; Did I disagree with anyone and everyone? I pretty much try to stick with technical matters, John. IMO, it's the only way to lick amplifier problems. Rich R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00112.html (8,356 bytes)
9. [AMPS] An Idea for a New Feature @ Dayton (score: 1): Author: ab4ru@stc.net (Ron Hooper); Date: Sat, 05 Apr 1997 13:13:27 +0000; Lee was only making a joke, its nothing personal. I like reading the comments between you guys, I wish I had more time to devote to getting in myself. Ron W4WA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00125.html (8,855 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]