Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+An\s+apology\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] An apology (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:14:08 -0700
Today, YS1XS informed me that the AL-80A manual states that the max plate current is 550mA for the 3-500Z. Obviusly, I was wrong about the 500mA figure. My apologies to Mr. Rauch and his faithful gro
/archives//html/Amps/2001-10/msg00179.html (7,155 bytes)

2. [AMPS] An apology (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:33:23 -0500
Rich- when you are wrong, and caught, you (once in a blue moon) admit it. When you try to be a horses A**, you do a better, more complete, job. Bill-W4BSG - Bill Aycock -- Persimmon Hill Woodville, A
/archives//html/Amps/2001-10/msg00181.html (8,165 bytes)

3. [AMPS] An apology (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:48:31 -0700
// Have you perchance read *Animal Farm* by George Orwell? (a.k.a. Eric Arthur Blair, 1903-1950) What is the max plate-current rating of a 3-500Z? cheers - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vc
/archives//html/Amps/2001-10/msg00185.html (7,772 bytes)

4. [AMPS] An apology (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 15:31:43 -0500
Yes- I read it the first time , many years ago, and have read parts since (usually to check supposed 'quotations'. My only reference (Not one you would trust) says 400mA.-- So what? - Bill Aycock --
/archives//html/Amps/2001-10/msg00187.html (7,894 bytes)

5. [AMPS] An apology (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:39:36 -0700
// The apology wasn't. // 3-500Z manufacturers say 400mA. In my experiences, a fresh 3-500Z begins to saturate c. 420mA. However, one amplifier "expert"says tuning up at 550mA is fb and he claims to
/archives//html/Amps/2001-10/msg00202.html (8,072 bytes)

6. [AMPS] An apology (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 21:53:53 -0500
I did not think, or say, it was I don't know why you brought Orwell into it.. You asked if I had read it- I said yes. If you insist on asking silly questions, at least take the answer at face value.
/archives//html/Amps/2001-10/msg00205.html (8,343 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu