Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Another\s+arc\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Another\s+arc\s+question\s*$/: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 5 May 98 22:34:33 -0500; OK, Thanks to those who responded to my seemingly dumb question about why no carbonization marks exist around tubes which supposedly had an arc-over in them. Specifically this is in regards to the be; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00059.html (8,977 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: pcmeas@hotmail.com (Arlen Mendelssohn); Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 01:32:31 PDT; Oh, dear Jon (how often does a gent get to begin a letter with "dear Jon" eh?, our poor dear junior engineer. Some of your questions do embarrass those of us who think highly of college education. On; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00061.html (12,920 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 6 May 98 07:40:24 -0800; -- i.e., arc cratering does not involve carbon. electrons are temporarily ripped off. Oxygen gas and/or nitrogen gas become conductors when enough potential gradient exists to free their electrons.; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00069.html (9,475 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 6 May 98 07:40:26 -0800; Bill Clinton has a college education and he apparently still has problems with ordinary zippers. Like a bunch o' gigavolts Not a good bet, Arlen. Indeed. . As I recall, there is a word for a slow-fl; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00070.html (13,501 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 6 May 98 10:58:10 -0500; Dear Arlen, Thanks for your reply to me questions on arcing. Perhaps you are a genius and can remember everything you've every been taught in a classroom. I do not. Well, I went to the number 4 schoo; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00072.html (12,106 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene); Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 09:44:47 -0700; wrong again, Rich. He went to Yale -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@cont; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00074.html (8,279 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 21:51:48 EDT; Are you now confusing or mixing up "gas" Rich. Gas due to imperfect seals is not the same as gas released internally from the materials. I also suspect that your microamp hipot tester will not be cap; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00081.html (12,440 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 03:57:02 -0800; The point is that gas is not gradually absorbed by a getter -- i.e., the rauchian disappearing gas theory does not wash. However, the basic problem is that gas is seldom found in tubes with bent fil; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00083.html (13,081 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:02:46 +0100; Proof, please? 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Subm; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00084.html (8,872 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 09:16:21 -0500; Agreed. I thought that this was how gas eminating from the metals in a tube was taken care of. I gotta question ya on this one, Rich. 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden jono@webspun.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00085.html (9,079 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 09:17:22 -0500; HUH? How can a magnetic field bend carbon? Last time I checked carbon was not a magnetic material. I think Carl here is just trying to throw stuff out here to confuse the issue. Junk science to coin; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00086.html (12,074 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: ggeurts@amp.com (Geurts, Gerard); Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 15:39:39 +0100; Your amp was not in cutoff. Unless you call 50 mA plate current 'cutoff'. When this event happened your amp was biased in the 'active region'. What are you trying to proof? I thought the whole idea o; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00087.html (11,912 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 10:20:46 -0500; What do you call cutoff? Zero mA plate current? It certainly wasn't keyed and was just idling. Even in class AB operation some current is likely going to be drawn as just quiescent current. Idle cur; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00088.html (10,830 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 08:59:39 -0800; The statement was in regard to tubes that are not in use. The proof is that the gassy tubes that I have come across have so far not become ungassy whilt sitting about in cardboard boxes. cheers Rich; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00089.html (9,131 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: ggeurts@amp.com (Geurts, Gerard); Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 16:59:38 +0100; Yep, or maybe something like 50 micro-A in real life. Certainly not 50 mA. In a typical amateur radio GG amplifier a series resistor is used to provide 'cut off bias'. This can of course only work if; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00090.html (12,052 bytes)
16. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: KF0FX@aol.com (KF0FX); Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 12:43:45 EDT; << Arcs do not depend on the existence of a gas. Do you believe you could never get an arc in outer space, for instance? Please refer, if you will, to your sophomore physics book. In a vacuum, with a; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00091.html (11,680 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 12:26:19 -0800; I have never claimed that our suppressors stop parasitics. . In Wes' suppressor tests, Rich's suppressor exhibited around a 40% improvement (decrease) in parallel equivalent resistance (Rp) at 100MH; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00092.html (10,451 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 13:23:56 -0800; Getters work when the tube is being used. Filament to grid shorted tubes, which were supposedly degassed by the getter, were not put into use after the filament shorted to the grid. cheers Rich... R; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00093.html (10,077 bytes)
19. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 21:31:19 EDT; y I doubt if he has a clue Gerard. See the message to follow for an idea of what sort of mind we are dealing with. 73 Carl KM1H _____________________________________________________________________ Y; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00095.html (9,699 bytes)
20. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 21:31:20 EDT; SNIP I suspect that Jon is the only one who belives that they will "stop" parasitics. Anyone who has ever bothered to read (and the hard part is "understand") your info would realize their purpose. O; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00096.html (10,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]