Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Are\s+8950\'s\s+Good\s+on\s+6m\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Are\s+8950\'s\s+Good\s+on\s+6m\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Are 8950's Good on 6m? (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:09:31 -0500; I am thinking of modifying a 10m amp built with a pair of 8950's for 6m ... are the 8950's good for 6m, please? How about for AM? (I have read that they were designed by GE specifically for RF servic; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00165.html (6,842 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Are 8950's Good on 6m? (score: 1): Author: nospam4me@juno.com (Skip S Isaham); Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 02:42:49 EST; Are 8950's good on 6m? Hi David, The answer is yes. But it's not cost effective. When the tubes fail or fade, their replacement via the NOS method isn't worth it. You'd be much better off going with; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00186.html (8,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]