Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+BC610\.\.\.\s+no\s+833\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+BC610\.\.\.\s+no\s+833\'s\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 08:46:12 -0700; It was written... "BC-610 output tank coils that were used in a plate modulated c1940 transmitter that ran a pushpull pair of 833 modulated by 810's (? before my time). The BC-610 tank used a nifty s; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00875.html (8,198 bytes)
2. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:48:42 +0100; I'm sure George is correct on that. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: ow; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00876.html (8,381 bytes)
3. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 08:57:10 -0700; And the sweet ozone smell that turned out be harmful. later, George - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contestin; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00878.html (8,989 bytes)
4. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:24:55 -0400; As I recall, later BC-610's used 813's modulated by 810's. Early ones used those old Eimac tubes like 100TL's or something. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00880.html (8,007 bytes)
5. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 22:44:38 -0400; I'll confirm that! Now, to take it one step further, the 100-TH's were driven by 2A3's! The oscillators were 6L6's. One would expect that with a plug in coil that the BC-610, (or BEASTLY 610), would; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00897.html (9,676 bytes)
6. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 22:51:12 -0400; Wrongo Tom! The later models, (specifically the I model, which was the last) and the when the government no longer needed them Bill Halligan returned the old HT-4 label to them, always had an a 250-T; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00898.html (9,315 bytes)
7. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 02:06:57 -0700; The "expert" gets caught fabricating. My guess is that the expert's sycophants will be complaining bitterly about you in secret to our moderator. Thanks for the real story, Mike - Rich..., 805.386.3; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00900.html (9,787 bytes)
8. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:30:52 -0400; I wasn't sure about the 813's, but I knew they never used 833's! I think I might have mixed up an ART-13 with the BC-610. Was the ART-13 the rig with the 813 PA and 810 or 812 modulators? 73, Tom W8; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00902.html (8,577 bytes)
9. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: K0FF@ARRL.NET (K0FF); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:25:01 -0500; The BC 610 was a 390 pound mobile transmitter using 250 TH final modulated by a pair of 100 THs for 400 W. It was "mobile" because it was part of an army RTTY station mounted in the back of a duce-an; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00905.html (10,303 bytes)
10. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:31:49 -1000; Fabricating???? "As I recall.............or something." That does not sound like expert information to me, but a guess. Seems to be a "push" accusation by you, Rich. 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: htt; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00915.html (8,802 bytes)
11. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:28:07 -0400; The ART-13 used a single 813 modulated by a pair of 811's. The neat thing about this transmitter is that the modulating transformer utilized a tertiary winding to modulate the screen. Also, when an a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00918.html (9,704 bytes)
12. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:32:00 -0400; Geo, Wasn't the whole "kit & kaboodle" called the SSC-229(???). This included the deuce 1/2, 10 KW generator, BC-610, and usually a SX-28? Mike(y) W3SLK -- Original Message -- From: K0FF <K0FF@arrl.n; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00919.html (11,454 bytes)
13. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: K9MUF@aol.com (K9MUF@aol.com); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 18:23:14 EDT; We called it the "angry 26" for ANGRC 26 (Army Navy Ground Radio Communications) I operated, and was in charge of one in 1953 over in Korea. We were in communications between Division HQ and the Air; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00922.html (8,140 bytes)
14. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:18:18 -0700; I have been down this road before. For Tom, the current stumbling block is the gold-sputtered 8877 that was removed from an AL-1500 amplifier. Idle chatter is way better than talking about that. Nec; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00923.html (8,701 bytes)
15. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: jeff@wa1hco.mv.com (jeff millar); Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 20:33:52 -0400; For the record, I was the first one to be wrong. I consider it an honor to provoke measures into behaving like a jerk. jeff -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contest; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00925.html (8,752 bytes)
16. [AMPS] BC610... no 833's (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:19:04 -0700; - lap dog - n. 1. A small dog kept as a pet. 2. Informal. One that is eager to do another's bidding, especially so as to maintain a position of privilege or favor: - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00928.html (8,628 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]