Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Backfires\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Backfires\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Backfires (score: 1): Author: pcmeas@hotmail.com (Arlen Mendelssohn); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 22:45:57 PDT; This is not true if the discussions are kept to physical and scientific principles and the parties involved can avoid ego competitions. A very intersting example can be seen in the Sring 1998 versio; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00333.html (7,943 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Backfires (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 19 May 98 01:44:47 -0800; ? I am talking about scientific profferings that do not wash. I am talking about explanations of physical evidence that are not reasonable. . So Arlen, do all "coils" act as RF chokes at VHF because; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00336.html (8,983 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]