Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Big\s+Bang\s+Theories\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Big\s+Bang\s+Theories\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: N3XBU@aol.com (N3XBU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 21:26:31 EDT; Hi Guys. Any ideas on Mark's problem? Email direct: nm5k@wt.net Want to pick your brains... I'm sure most have heard the stories about the vhf parasitic oscillations in hf power amps. In the past I h; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00174.html (11,269 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com); Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 15:13:54 -0400; Have you actually removed the PS caps and tested or can you measure the voltage drop across each one? Could be one shorted and the rest are carrying the load for now. With 7 caps you are right on the; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00180.html (8,805 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 17 May 99 09:56:13 -0500; And I don't think a parasitic oscillation every does go BANG! Stable amplifiers do not just suddenly break into an oscillation. Don't mess with the suppressors other than to check the value of the r; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00187.html (10,337 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: w4eto@rainbow.rmii.com (Richard W. Ehrhorn); Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 13:52:54 -0600; I'll toss in an opinion the the question below: Big BANG means an air-borne arc(vs. inside the tube vacuum) OR an exploding component - such as the plate choke exploding when a tube arcs in an amp wi; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00194.html (12,470 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: w4eto@rainbow.rmii.com (Richard W. Ehrhorn); Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 14:39:08 -0600; Pardon, Jon, but sound waves don't propagate in the absence of some medium, such as air or water. A big "bang" in a vacuum is essentially inaudible; however the multi-hundred-amp current surge, or th; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00199.html (11,372 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 17 May 99 16:00:36 -0500; You're right, Dick. I realized that as soon as Rich pointed it out. I sent that post too early in the morning after drinking too much beer with Peter Chadwick and getting too little sleep at Dayton!; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00200.html (8,109 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 08:07:07 +0100; Been there... done that... BIG mistake... Or perhaps it still was (see other posting). If there's one thing worse than a big bang, it's when it happens the morning after an evening spent with Master; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00206.html (8,097 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Big Bang Theories? (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 08:14:30 +0100; The gases do not "burn up" - you're thinking atmospheric chemistry, not vacuum chemistry. All the metal and ceramic materials used to make the tube are processed to be almost gas-free, but this can n; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00207.html (11,370 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]