Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Blown\s+TL922A\.\.\.\s+What\s+to\s+do\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Blown\s+TL922A\.\.\.\s+What\s+to\s+do\?\s*$/: 246 ]

Total 246 documents matching your query.

121. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 22:26:51 -0400; Because it is better if neither you or I edit the conclusions of an independent observer, or change the data. The conclusions are best read from the N7WS web page, since he did the analysis. (Those; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00381.html (9,428 bytes)
122. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 20:20:06 -0700; ? Independent observor.? Wes' was pretty clearly in the Rauchian camp before the measurements. Technically, Wes was on solid ground. He realized that by increasing L-supp, the Q of a copper-wire sup; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00382.html (10,347 bytes)
123. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 18:09:32 -1000; By Tom: By Rich: By me: Well, that is it.... I am out of this reflector for awhile!! Had enough of this .......... 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@co; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00383.html (9,276 bytes)
124. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: jeff@wa1hco.mv.com (jeff millar); Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 01:22:41 -0400; I'm sympathetic...but maybe you can just add a kill rule? I'm actually getting interested in the psychological aspects of the exchanges. It reminds me of the debate over where to place the new high s; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00384.html (11,300 bytes)
125. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 07:27:39 +0100; --Original Message-- From: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> To: Steve Thompson <rfamps@ic24.net> Cc: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 10 September 2000 01:05 S; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00385.html (9,871 bytes)
126. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 03:05:04 -0700; Amen. What I know saddens me much. Ibsen was right. The sins of the fathers Are visited upon the children. cheers, Jeff. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00386.html (9,095 bytes)
127. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 03:05:06 -0700; There are few measurements. The theory that allows it to happen is the main thing. As I recall, during the Grate Debate, Mr. Rauch disclosed that there was a series-resonance in the AL-80 Tune-C, I; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00387.html (10,186 bytes)
128. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 03:05:07 -0700; To: <amps@contesting.com> The MLA-2500 is apparently not a bandswitch destroyer. The TL-922 is. The 6000v Tune-C makes the 5000v bandswitch more vulnerable. later, Steve - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00388.html (10,666 bytes)
129. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: sasha@panet.bits.net (YZ6X Sasha Kraljevich); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 12:42:12 +0200; Why mix the politics with AMPs? What US foreign politics has to do with purpose of this reflector? Better like parasitics! [Snip] [Snip] the Oooooops! It's not even about US politics. I just noticed; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00389.html (10,189 bytes)
130. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 12:51:33 -0400; Good, if I can help let me know. Independent sources are the best sources of information. N7WS concluded nichrome has no VHF advantage in suppressor systems. It's on his web page. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00396.html (9,283 bytes)
131. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 10:52:13 -0700; Snow. Reading Wes' embarrassing measurements should probably be avoided by members of the Rauchian camp. . - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00402.html (9,369 bytes)
132. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 14:36:44 EDT; << Why mix the politics with AMPs? What US foreign politics has to do with purpose of this reflector? Better like parasitics! I would say politics and parasites are perfect bedfellows!!! HANK, N6BUU; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00407.html (9,067 bytes)
133. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: dhb@mediaone.net (Dave, AA6YQ); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 15:18:55 -0400; I've monitored this reflector for the past several years; both Tom and Rich have provided helpful information in response to my occasional queries. My engineering background and professional experien; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00409.html (11,756 bytes)
134. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 12:43:48 -0700; Yea, verily, HANK - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00410.html (9,237 bytes)
135. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:00:01 -0700; Using such software, it was determined that the 8877 is likely to be able to oscillate above 100MHz. In my opinion, corrective measures are indicated. The intermittent nature of VHF parasites makes; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00412.html (9,706 bytes)
136. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: dhb@mediaone.net (Dave, AA6YQ); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:49:24 -0400; model modeled "is likely to be able to oscillate" is a subjective assessment; we seek objective, repeatable proof. Either the model oscillates, or it doesn't. If the model oscillates, it will do so; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00415.html (10,582 bytes)
137. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:00:37 -0700; So at 99.999MHz, no oscillation. At 100.000MHz oscillation. . In my experience parasitics tend to be not very predictable. My guess is that the di/dt of the DC current change the creates the VHF dam; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00418.html (11,045 bytes)
138. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 20:17:21 -0400; The arguments aren't all that tangled. My conclusions are based on my experience and measurements...and knowing what fails in the field as a percentage of what goes out based on feedback over the pa; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00421.html (14,271 bytes)
139. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 20:17:22 -0400; The self-neutralizing frequency of an 8877 with properly grounded grid is several hundred MHz. I suppose the tube might be "likely" to oscillate up there if conditions are right. What makes a parasit; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00422.html (9,795 bytes)
140. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1): Author: ve3tu@rac.ca (Steve); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 20:15:29 -0400; Hi Tom and all on the amp reflector, I was wondering if the tests you did with the 8877 tube checking for grid to cathode shorts was done with a hard start or soft start filament supply, and did you; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00425.html (9,081 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]