Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Blown\s+TL922A\.\.\.\s+What\s+to\s+do\?\s*$/: 246 ]

Total 246 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:43:18 -0400
The paragraph below shows why you color the data you get, and misrepresent it. You have an agenda, to prove everyone who is successful is a crook. You don't need to "inspect" the tubes, you already k
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00150.html (10,833 bytes)

22. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 13:42:09 -0500
Tom- it does NOT take an EE to detect the bias. My professional specialty was Rocket motors, with only enough electronics exposure to 'appliance operate' good instruments, but my second specialty (us
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00152.html (10,946 bytes)

23. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:12:55 -0700
? I never know about gold-sputtering until I reverse the polarity of the anode potential on the high-pot. . ? Eimac engineering didn't disagree. Reid (Mr. XXX) Brandon of the Marketing Dept. did. Re
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00153.html (11,587 bytes)

24. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:33:19 -0700
The BS-detector test -- During the Grate debate, when it was revealed that AC circuit analysis disproved one of Mr. Rauch's assertions, he claimed that AC circuit analysis is not valid for L/R paras
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00155.html (9,476 bytes)

25. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:45:11 -0400
But then why does nearly every current-day HF amplifier manufacturer use "1935 technology" with the inclusion of the classic coil turned around a carbon composition resistor for the purpose of servi
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00157.html (10,138 bytes)

26. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 17:09:33 -0500
Rich- I NEVER make a determination from a statement taken out of contextespecially when it is given by a suspect source. I have seen several statements from you, about Tom, that I know to be distorti
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00158.html (10,560 bytes)

27. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:11:24 -0700
good question, Paul. During the Grate Parasitics Debate, six times, the designer of the AL-1500 stonewalled my question about whether the 1500 uses a VHF parasitic-suppressor. cheers - Rich..., 805.
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00160.html (10,383 bytes)

28. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
It is an interesting question. Why do some amps have suppressors and some don't? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywher
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00161.html (11,558 bytes)

29. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:26:22 -0400
Rich, What I said was, YOUR analysis was flawed. That's a lot different than saying AC circuit analysis isn't valid. But then I expect you know that. Why not answer questions, instead of slinging ac
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00163.html (9,529 bytes)

30. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:26:22 -0400
1935 technology was to use distributed losses in the system, with or without additional lumped components. There was a valid reason for that in the 30's, tubes had long internal connections and shie
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00164.html (13,006 bytes)

31. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sounds neat! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/F
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00165.html (15,145 bytes)

32. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:14:01 -0400
Could it be that "self-oscillation" at or near the operating frequency and VHF oscillation (parasitics) are rooted in the same mechanical design and layout limitations, and depending on the accuracy
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00168.html (10,331 bytes)

33. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 19:10:26 -0500
you want one- OK- You claim Tom does not understand certain mathematic notations- two- your insulting mistranslation of word associations about the word 'rauch'. with a little search I could find a c
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00169.html (12,073 bytes)

34. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:16:25 -0700
813s never need VHF suppressors. One can barely get them to work at 28MHz. 3-500Zs are rated for full output at 110MHz for Amplifier and Oscillator service. 8877s are rated for full suds at 300MHz.
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00172.html (12,580 bytes)

35. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:16:29 -0700
813s never oscillated. [chortle] Why do so many 8877s reportedly fail in AL-1500s? Why did you stonewall me six times when I repeatedly asked you if the AL-1500 uses a VHF parasitic suppressor?. che
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00173.html (13,851 bytes)

36. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:16:28 -0700
No. The archive provides a different account from you. You have Wil's archive for verification, Mr. Rauch. It's all there, including the suggestion that I might be porkin' my teenage helper for the
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00174.html (9,890 bytes)

37. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: ki6sz@compuserve.com (Don Kessler)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:32:33 -0400
"Sounds like you have outgassed. You need to take more nichrome... The tank is typically a virtual short for VHF and UHF energy, because it has a capacitor shunting the input. All your claims about V
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00175.html (11,258 bytes)

38. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:51:50 -0700
Tom said he did not understand how e2/e1^23.4 was derived from the info on thoriated tungsten emission life in Care and Feeding. I have heard this from those who know him. I have seen numerous suspe
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00177.html (12,969 bytes)

39. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 22:29:17 -0500
So What?- only a low-life would use that as a weapon in what should be a technical discussion. I have heard from others I respect that they dropped you into the 'kill' filter because of that show of
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00179.html (9,653 bytes)

40. [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do? (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Rich, Tom and Don, Thank you Don for this balancing message. I would like to repectfully request that Rich quit smearing Tom with snide-isms and Tom quit smearing Rich with whatever - so that it will
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00180.html (14,293 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu