Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+C\s+\&\s+LC\s+Connectors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+C\s+\&\s+LC\s+Connectors\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: irosky@yahoo.com (igor rosky); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 02:33:03 -0700 (PDT); Are C and LC connectors referred to the same thing or are the different creatures? What is the more more cost effective connector, C or LC? And what is the typical HF power rating for these connector; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00332.html (7,678 bytes)
2. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 98 10:32:27 -0000; C and LC are different. C connectors have an electrical spec of 3KV continuous LC connecotrs have an electrical spec of up to 10 KV continuous and 250 KW peak power. There is also an LC series that; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00340.html (8,045 bytes)
3. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:57:30 -0400; On Wed, 21 Oct 1998 02:33:03 -0700 (PDT) igor rosky <irosky@yahoo.com> writes: C connectors are for RG-213 size cable. LC are for RG-17 size and Heliax. They are completely different. 73 Carl KM1H __; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00342.html (8,838 bytes)
4. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: badger@telalink.net (Tom Norris); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:58:34 -0600; Now *I* am confused, I had thought the threaded version of the C was the HN. BUT, both the C and HN are for RG-214, etc, but if I remember correctly, the LC is a larger connector for a larger size ca; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00346.html (8,529 bytes)
5. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 01:32:03 -0400; On Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:58:34 -0600 Tom Norris <badger@telalink.net> writes: It is easy to get confused by incomplete data! Yes, the HN and the C are what you thought. The C is not rated for outdoor u; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00351.html (9,846 bytes)
6. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 98 10:05:21 -0000; While this is true, there are other cable sizes that fit as well. In my catalog right in front of me: LC: Available cables seem to be RG-119, RG-218, 50GD (?), 50GP (?), RG-18, RG-219, KX-14, 0.393,; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00358.html (8,414 bytes)
7. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:06:32 -0400; I distinctly said RG-17 size cable which inferred there are others included. The RG-17 family includes 17, 17A, 18, 18A, 177, 218, 219, 295. I am also sure there are numerous other LC connector varia; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00360.html (10,160 bytes)
8. [AMPS] C & LC Connectors (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 98 11:59:52 -0000; OK. Understood now. I thought you meant specifically RG-17. Thank you for the education. It IS hard to keep up on all the different sizes and families! I'd agree. Not good to get the wrong connector; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00361.html (8,909 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]