Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+CTI\s+ComTEC\,\s+Inc\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: plamarc1@tampabay.rr.com (Phil LaMarche)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:43:41 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_004C_01C12BEA.6318DD00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit TRIODES ARE GOOD, TETRODES ARE BETT
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00302.html (12,763 bytes)

2. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:58:56 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_008D_01C12BE4.21D79940 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The issue of screen cur
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00303.html (10,865 bytes)

3. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:48:29 -0400
Actually 4CX250's are among the poorest tubes for IMD. Was you amp ever type accepted? What is the TA number? I did an FCC database search, and couldn't find it. You know of course any amplifier of
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00304.html (9,276 bytes)

4. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:49:21 -0700
// This was an easy mistake to make since good engineering practice is to incorporate some means of limiting screen dissipation to a safe level. However, screen current limiting must not happen duri
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00306.html (8,353 bytes)

5. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 05:51:54 -0400
Cathode driven tubes are for the most part extremely linear, especially when driving impedance is high and grid currents low. The inherent negative feedback and loading of the exciter reduces or eli
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00310.html (9,451 bytes)

6. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: w2fca@qsl.net (Frank Ayers)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 05:55:08 -0700
If memory serves me, a number of months ago this same amp was set up NOT to work on ten meters, and there was a note that modifying it to do so would void the warantee. Frank W2FCA -- FAQ on WWW: ht
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00312.html (7,944 bytes)

7. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: Wlfuqu00@pop.uky.edu (wlfuqu00@uky.edu)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:15:29 -0400
That is one think I like about guy that builds these. He has made it difficult for this amp to be modified for 11 meters or 10. He, unlike the others, marketing his amps to the CB crowd. 73 Bill wa4l
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00313.html (8,833 bytes)

8. [AMPS] CTI ComTEC, Inc. (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:52:53 -0400
That really doesn't mean anything. I find a grantee code of PHD issued for CTI Comtec, but a search of PHD in the FCC database at http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid/ shows no TA or other FCC authorization
/archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00317.html (7,924 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu