Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Conjugate\s+Matching\s+$again$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Conjugate\s+Matching\s+$again$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching (again) (score: 1): Author: n1rj@pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 12:43:32 -0400; Just to make sure I was correct, I looked up conjugate match in one of my textbooks. A conjugate match exists when reactances are cancelled and the resistance of the load is matched to the internal r; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00047.html (7,591 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching (again) (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 22:26:40 -0700; limiting the be conjugately ? amen operating range. ? I design amplifiers for maximum power out and good linearity. For Class AB1, this means relatively high anode / screen potentials and zero grid; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00048.html (8,138 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching (again) (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 22:00:08 -0500; Roger, doggone it, you are correct! I remember people (I think it was Dick Erhorn) telling me this once before. Yes, maximum efficiency is not the point of maximum power transfer. Every design has it; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00079.html (8,232 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]