Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Diff\.\s+Between\s+Alpha\s+78\s+and\s+\"374\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Diff\.\s+Between\s+Alpha\s+78\s+and\s+\"374\"\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Diff. Between Alpha 78 and "374" (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 11:02:00 -0500; The 374 did not cover 160M, the 2 hole 374A did. The 78 is later. Both will not work on 12M without a plate choke change. Both use the same quality components. 73 Carl KM1H . ________________________; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00343.html (8,329 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Diff. Between Alpha 78 and "374" (score: 1): Author: hamoperator@usa.net (D.H); Date: 26 Nov 98 18:34:41 MST; What are the differences between the Alpha 78 and "374", both 3 "holers" ? Which one was the latest manufactured and which one is "better" ?. 73 de Dario _____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00339.html (7,169 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]