Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Distortion\s+Measurement\s+Distortion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Distortion\s+Measurement\s+Distortion\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:33:48 -0700; If such a measurement is made to determine how much splatter one is generating on the air, on adjacent frequencies with human voice modulation, why not measure the relative signal strengths the same; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00345.html (7,819 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:12:48 +0100; For you and me, it's what happens on the air with speech that really matters. For labs and reviewers, they need some way to make consistent tests that are reproducible from rig to rig. However, these; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00356.html (9,350 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:55:02 +0100; And the display 'bloom' if you have the intensity up too far! But there, modern spectrum analysers put the intelligence behind the front panel. The 141 and its ilk require the intelligence between th; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00359.html (8,220 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 05:32:10 -0400; For commercial equipment testing I have to use multiple sweep storage. The TS-2000 looks like inverted dinner plate instead of a pyramid. I take it as a sign the engineer who was supposed to look at; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00362.html (8,541 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:35:08 +0100; To get it just right in storage mode, that intensity control really does need a slow-motion drive! Artificial intelligence... no substitute for the real thing. 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00364.html (8,457 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:00:41 +0100; Tom, What's wrong with using the 'peak hold' function? 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesti; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00365.html (7,858 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:48:52 -0400; Of course I use peak, but the peak hold does not work when looking at actual modulation with the narrow bandwidths and slow sweep required to accurately get a bandwidth picture. I normally set the a; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00373.html (8,092 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Distortion Measurement Distortion (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 07:20:18 +0100; Classic case of misunderstanding by me of what Tom meant! 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@conte; /archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00385.html (7,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]