- 1. [AMPS] EVALUATION OF HENRY 2K CLASSIC (score: 1)
- Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Colin Lamb)
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:19:33 -0700
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0012_01C01C03.B01C53E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Over the weekend I had
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00494.html (11,451 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] EVALUATION OF HENRY 2K CLASSIC (score: 1)
- Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 19:21:26 -0400
- Is this mainly because the variable inductor needs many turns of cranking? Have you seen the spinner knob for sale at <http://radiodan.com/Henry/parts/spinner.htm>? Would that help? -Chuck W1HIS --
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00496.html (7,505 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] EVALUATION OF HENRY 2K CLASSIC (score: 1)
- Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 16:40:38 -0700
- Amen. The SB-220 is a winner - provided: the fan motor is oiled every couple of years, it gets the high speed switching mod, glitch protection, and lower VHF Q suppressors. later, Colin - Rich..., 8
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00499.html (8,904 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu