- 1. [AMPS] Elementary question (Shame) (score: 1)
- Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 13:23:52 -0500
- OK Men, I have hesitated to ax this before 'cause it's so basic that I should have been born with the info. Feeling extra humble today, so here goes. We spend time calculating and almost endless time
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00680.html (7,808 bytes)
- 2. SV: [AMPS] Elementary question (Shame) (score: 1)
- Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 20:56:13 +0200
- Why roller coils at all? Is it not easier to series tune the coil? It was done, if I remember right, in the WRL linear using a large number of sweep tubes. By the way you BIG roller coil lovers: if y
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00681.html (9,501 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Elementary question (Shame) (score: 1)
- Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 20:03:05 -0500
- A roller coil gives the advantage of being able to tune the tank for maximum efficiency at any power setting and frees one from many hours of tapping a fixed coil in place in a new amp. It is very s
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00688.html (8,617 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu