Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+FW\:\s+Suppressor\s+analysis\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] FW: Suppressor analysis (score: 1)
Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:32:03 +0100
To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00283.html (9,162 bytes)

2. [AMPS] FW: Suppressor analysis (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:03:16 -0700
To: <amps@contesting.com> ok ? Steve - you added a capacitor instead of adding an inductor. Whasup with that? Capacitors do not generate electro magnetic fields. This problem does not involve 2 capa
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00288.html (9,926 bytes)

3. [AMPS] FW: Suppressor analysis (score: 1)
Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:43:23 +0100
with my To: <amps@contesting.com> decoupled. stagger-tuning the can different Is the result different if you take a parallel tuned circuit and add an extra inductor in parallel? I'd say not. Steve --
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00291.html (9,498 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu