- 1. [AMPS] FW: Suppressor analysis (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:32:03 +0100
- To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00283.html (9,162 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] FW: Suppressor analysis (score: 1)
- Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:03:16 -0700
- To: <amps@contesting.com> ok ? Steve - you added a capacitor instead of adding an inductor. Whasup with that? Capacitors do not generate electro magnetic fields. This problem does not involve 2 capa
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00288.html (9,926 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] FW: Suppressor analysis (score: 1)
- Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:43:23 +0100
- with my To: <amps@contesting.com> decoupled. stagger-tuning the can different Is the result different if you take a parallel tuned circuit and add an extra inductor in parallel? I'd say not. Steve --
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00291.html (9,498 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu