Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Fw\:\s+alpha\s+input\s+swamp\s+circuit\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Fw\:\s+alpha\s+input\s+swamp\s+circuit\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Fw: alpha input swamp circuit (score: 1): Author: nospam4me@juno.com (skipp isaham); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 00:09:06 -0800; re: Alpha type toroidal input circuit - A follow up comment regarding the addition of the series R and a UF Diode in parallel with the tube cathodes in an Alpha type input circuit. - It's obvious the; /archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00254.html (9,101 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Fw: alpha input swamp circuit (score: 1): Author: shr@ricc.net (Signal Hill Ranch); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:18:32 -0700; One thing that I haven't noticed being mentioned in this discussion that was certainly a factor in the decision to use the swamp circuit was gain reduction. The FCC had just recently defined the maxi; /archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00258.html (7,189 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Fw: alpha input swamp circuit (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:37:06 -0800; // Good point, John. Most of the CBers I know who run 1500w amplifiers run 100w - 150w ham transceivers because they are superior to CB transceivers. Most CB "technicians" are quite familiar with wh; /archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00261.html (7,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]