Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+G2DAF\s+Amplifier\s+etc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+G2DAF\s+Amplifier\s+etc\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] G2DAF Amplifier etc. (score: 1): Author: bjk@ihug.co.nz (Barry Kirkwood); Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 08:57:33 +1300; FWIW The G2DAF design was featured in the 4th edition (1968) of the RSGB Handbook, did not appear in 5th of 1976 which showed a 2x813 gg job. Suggests the editors thought gg better practice. Neverthe; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00638.html (8,167 bytes)
2. [AMPS] G2DAF Amplifier etc. (score: 1): Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 08:47:14 +0000; Sorry, but none of that says anything about IMD. RSGB handbook editors tend to favour whatever was more recently published in the monthly magazine. It implies no technical judgement whatever. (The 81; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00649.html (7,979 bytes)
3. [AMPS] G2DAF Amplifier etc. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:48:09 -0800; My pal Hal built a 2, 813 DAF amplifier. IMD level was roughly -21db when he ran moderate grid current. He eventually switched to G-G. IMD improved c. 13db. end - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.co; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00658.html (8,036 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]