Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+HA\-10\s+Warrior\s+Parasitic\s+Supressor\s+Inductor\s+Values\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: ko4nrbs@yahoo.com (Bill Smith)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 00:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
My old Warrior's parasitic supressors need to be changed and I need to know what the optimum value of inducatance is for the supressor. The carbon type resistors are showing their age as well. Not on
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00024.html (8,379 bytes)

2. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:22:42 -0700
// Suppressor resistors (Rsup) typically increase in resistance during an intermittent parasitic oscillation condition. Thus, it seems likely that you had one or more. For instance, I have seen Rsup
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00028.html (10,350 bytes)

3. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:37:16 +0100
"So-called" is correct. According to the schematics, it consisted of a feedback capacitor from the output end of the pi-tank, back to the cathode. This will produce feedback of variable amplitude and
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00031.html (9,546 bytes)

4. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:00:29 -0400
That is NOT correct Ian. Bad enough that Rich says things without being fully aware what is going on! The feedback in the Warrior is from the anode, through a capacitor, through a phase inverting tr
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00032.html (11,318 bytes)

5. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:36:45 +0100
Sorry, it appears I was confusing the Warrior with another amp... maybe the Yaesu, though I don't recall ever seen that schematic. I agree that a phase inverting transformer, coupled as you describe,
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00036.html (11,526 bytes)

6. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:10:51 -0700
// The latter, Ian cheers - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests:
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00038.html (10,041 bytes)

7. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:10:53 -0700
// Rich is fully aware that the 811's filament is the "cathode" (Ian). // The Warrior and the Gonset 4, 811A amplifier used the same neutralization scheem. // However, there must be a frequency-depe
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00039.html (11,993 bytes)

8. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:41:18 +0100
Just a plain fact. The circuits are different. 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.com/g3sek -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00041.html (9,432 bytes)

9. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:49:37 -0400
Hi Ian, I'm not sure if all runs of the FL2100 do this, but the FL2100 I looked at takes a sample of RF after the pi-network and feeds it back to the input. Of course in that system the operating Q o
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00047.html (10,234 bytes)

10. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:30:58 -0700
// Is the theory of operation different? - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administr
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00050.html (9,271 bytes)

11. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:31:02 -0700
// The sticky wicket is not that the Warrior oscillates on the operating frequency, it oscillates above the 811A's VHF grid resonance. This is seemingly why subsequent Heath models abandoned so call
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00052.html (10,798 bytes)

12. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:38:48 +0100
Basic electronic theory remains the same, but the circuit is different so the ways they operate are too. 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00054.html (10,074 bytes)

13. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 03:14:32 -0700
// Is neutralization at the operating frequency. or at the anode-resonance frequency (c. 80MHz)? - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00055.html (9,539 bytes)

14. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:08:19 +0100
We were just told that neutralization is carried out at the high end of the operating range. It's just another kind of balanced bridge, so it should improve stability at the VHF resonant frequency to
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00057.html (10,122 bytes)

15. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:02:01 -0700
Rich: // I do not accept everything I am told. Some men tell the truth but other men have less couth. // Why and how? Below the grid-resonance frequency, regeneration should not be possible since th
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00058.html (11,093 bytes)

16. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:58:29 -0400
I'd make sure I had a neutralizing system, and use a suppressor like the Ameritron AL811H uses if I was refurbishing a Warrior. There are two distinctly different stability problems with tubes like
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00060.html (13,372 bytes)

17. [AMPS] HA-10 Warrior Parasitic Supressor Inductor Values (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:42:54 -0700
// I have never heard of a grounded-grid 811A or 572B oscillating at HF. - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submission
/archives//html/Amps/2001-09/msg00062.html (9,109 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu