Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+HV\s+Transformer\s+Secondary\s+Resistance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+HV\s+Transformer\s+Secondary\s+Resistance\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] HV Transformer Secondary Resistance (score: 1): Author: markeh@erols.com (Mark Hall); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 07:03:20 -0500; Hi: I just purchased a 3.3KV @ 1000 ma, 40 pound, "never got warm @800 ma", transformer off the web. I measured the secondary resistance with a Fluke 8024B DVM using several different ranges and in a; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00175.html (8,358 bytes)
2. [AMPS] HV Transformer Secondary Resistance (score: 1): Author: Lane C. Zeitler" <km3g@cts.com (Lane C. Zeitler); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 20:56:51 -0700; Mark and the Group, My Dahl 3CX1200A7 special xmfr for the semi-popular CQ magazine mod for the L4B measured around 10 ohms secondary resistance using a Fluke 77BN. It had no center tap. I sold the x; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00176.html (9,917 bytes)
3. [AMPS] HV Transformer Secondary Resistance (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 07:59:39 +0100; 40 pounds strikes me as a bit light - I'd expect 70+ at that rating. Some similar I had made a while ago had secondary resistance of <20 ohms. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.ht; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00177.html (7,764 bytes)
4. [AMPS] HV Transformer Secondary Resistance (score: 1): Author: Lane C. Zeitler" <km3g@cts.com (Lane C. Zeitler); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 05:41:18 -0700; The Dahl xmfr weighs 66 pounds. Lane Km3G --Original Message-- From: Steve Thompson <amps@txrx.demon.co.uk> To: Mark Hall <markeh@erols.com> Cc: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@co; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00180.html (8,821 bytes)
5. [AMPS] HV Transformer Secondary Resistance (score: 1): Author: davek@medphys.ucl.ac.uk (Dave Kirkby); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 15:59:11 +0100; I suspect the transformer too. It sounds too light, and too resistive. I believe the following argument proves this. 3.3 kV@ 1 A is 3300 W if run into a purely resistive load - upon which most, but n; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00185.html (9,432 bytes)
6. [AMPS] HV Transformer Secondary Resistance (score: 1): Author: markeh@erols.com (Mark Hall); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 07:00:22 -0500; Sending that 3.3KV @ 1 ampere, 110VAC primary with 175 ohm secondary transformer back. Anyone got an alternative/replacement that'll run a 4-1000 full bore? '73 KI4Z -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00194.html (7,399 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]