Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Henry\s+SS750\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Henry\s+SS750\s+results\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Henry SS750 results (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 08:10:50 -0700; Recently I carried out some tests on my new Henry Radio SS750HF amplifier. This amplifier contains 8 2SC2879 transistors; it has 4 modules each with two transistors and splitter-combiner circuitry. T; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00058.html (9,062 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Henry SS750 results (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:01:36 -0500; Your amp is doing better than factory specs on all bands, Vic. Read the specs again....750 watts SSB and 500 watts DC. I did find a problem in my amp in the 10 meter low pass filter. A cap had chang; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00059.html (7,787 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Henry SS750 results (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 09:42:17 -0700; I presumed this referred to duty-cycle considerations. In other words, 500 watts RTTY. Anyway, if the amp can't deliver 750 watts CW for a short period, then it is saturating at not able to deliver 7; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00061.html (8,507 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Henry SS750 results (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 09:44:09 -0700; I can't seem to write. Here's what I meant to say: I presumed this referred to duty-cycle considerations. In other words, 500 watts RTTY. Anyway, if the amp can't deliver 750 watts CW for a short per; /archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00062.html (7,403 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]