Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+IMDs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+IMDs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:14:51 -0000; I happened to have an FT690R on the bench and the posts regarding IMDs prompted me to look at the results from a "typical" solid state driver. The FT690R is not renound for its quality output but I e; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00230.html (9,908 bytes)
2. [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 07:25:36 -0500; Are they dB below PEP (ARRL method), or dB below a single tone (commercial method)? 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contestin; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00233.html (8,565 bytes)
3. [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: itr@nanoteq.co.za (Ian Roberts); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 14:39:38 +0200; It's a pity you didn't rather use the audio gain to set the output at the required PEP? Tests such as this are linked to the old adage "linearity must be maintained", ALC is a form of compression. Po; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00235.html (8,919 bytes)
4. [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:40:52 -0000; No. no. Not that type of ALC. The tones were set to just give full output with the ALC off. There is an internal ALC that controls the gain of the transmitter. It is not compression as it is low pas; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00237.html (8,985 bytes)
5. [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:08:21 -0500; Yes, I re-read the text and see where you did mention it. It is important to call attention to the fact you used "below one tone" values. The ARRL uses below PEP, making everything look six dB bette; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00250.html (7,859 bytes)
6. [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:08:21 -0500; ...and a steady-state two-tone test or noise notch test does nothing to show how bad IMD is from poor supply regulation. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/amp; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00252.html (8,836 bytes)
7. [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:53:49 -0000; That may be - but it is a totally pointless statement considering it was an FT690... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00255.html (8,594 bytes)
8. SV: [AMPS] IMDs (score: 1): Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (sm5ki); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 20:11:08 +0000; On what band? -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00278.html (9,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]