Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Kenwood\s+ts2000\s+driving\s+a\s+G2DAF\s+amp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Kenwood\s+ts2000\s+driving\s+a\s+G2DAF\s+amp\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: sm3mxr@swipnet.se (Einar Persson); Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:25:25 +0200; If so, the G2DAF invention from the fifties or sixties is about as good or bad as the fairly new Kenwood TS2000. 73 Einar // SM3MXR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00025.html (8,459 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 08:06:24 -0500; So maybe we should drive a G2DAF with the TS-2000? :-) 73, Jon NA9D -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived."; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00027.html (8,732 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 07:15:20 -0700; // Wow! This is c. 11db more IMD than the Kenwood TS-440S. Did you measure the IMD yourself? If so, please describe how you measured it. cheers, Einar - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00029.html (9,269 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: sm3mxr@swipnet.se (Einar Persson); Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 00:42:20 +0200; No I have not measured it. Someone on this list said that the TS2000 has a lousy TX with IMD just a few figures better than 20db below pep. I think the figures came from a British test of the radio.; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00039.html (10,033 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:11:27 +0100; Peter's away from his e-mail for the weekend, so I guess it falls to me. At 100W PEP output, 3rd orders at HF were -26 to -31dB below PEP, ie -20 to -25dB below either tone. At 50MHz -21/-15dB, at 14; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00040.html (10,215 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:53:43 -0400; The ARRL and the RSGB both came up with almost identical numbers. As I recall, only one radio is history was worse than the TS2000 on transmit, and the receiver isn't that good either. QST publishes; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00042.html (9,161 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:51:29 -0700; thanks, Einar - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUES; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00045.html (8,520 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: w2imf@worldnet.att.net (Stephen Goldberg); Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 08:54:26 -0400; Can you tell us the $600 radio with the top RX performance? Steve W4IMF -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00047.html (9,492 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: fortra@siol.net (Nermin Bajramoviæ); Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:28:21 +0200; Hello Stephen, he means Elecraft K2. What the shame? Oh, our beloved Yaeicokenw!! Nermin S58DX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00048.html (8,795 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: w2imf@worldnet.att.net (Stephen Goldberg); Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 11:07:33 -0400; Thanks to all for directing me to the Elcraft site. Steve W4IMF -- Original Message -- From: "Nermin Bajramoviæ" <fortra@siol.net> To: "Stephen Goldberg" <w2imf@worldnet.att.net>; <W8JI@contest; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00049.html (9,800 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: Mike" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike); Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 15:37:04 -0700; Kenwood TS-830S Mike, W4EF...... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contestin; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00050.html (10,543 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 20:26:23 -0700; I presume he is referring to my own favorite rig, the Elecraft K2. 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00053.html (8,648 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:11:21 +0100; Tom, you're not trying to tell us that DSP is not the be-all and end-all, best thing since sliced bread, guaranteed snake oil cure for fogs, high wind and indigestion, helps babies while teething, th; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00063.html (9,248 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: Uwe.Egen@t-online.de (Uwe Egen); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:27:23 +0200; Hi Peter, My own experiences with 4 different DSP audio filters are modest and most no good. I tried often to read ssb or cw signals 'better' near the noise floor with DSP boxes. Believe me, I did no; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00066.html (9,109 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Kenwood ts2000 driving a G2DAF amp (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 07:23:20 -0500; Heh! Heh! A friend of mine who I used to work with, K9PPW, used to joke about the idea for a radio that was entirely software. Just had one big chip. That's it. Everything, including amplification wa; /archives//html/Amps/2001-08/msg00069.html (10,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]