Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+L\-4B\s+conversion\s+to\s+3CX1200\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+L\-4B\s+conversion\s+to\s+3CX1200\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] L-4B conversion to 3CX1200 (score: 1): Author: jhenders@tdrss.wsc.nasa.gov (Jim Henderson); Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 22:40:17 +0000; The Peter Dahl page has a reference to an article by Pete Warren in an old CQ magazine on the conversion of a Drake L-4B from 3-500s to either 1 or 2 3CX1200s. I cannot find the article, nor have I h; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00050.html (7,188 bytes)
2. [AMPS] L-4B conversion to 3CX1200 (score: 1): Author: morel.grunberg@telrad.co.il (Morel Grunberg); Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 08:19:38 +0200; Jim, I rcvd this article few years ago from Eimac with their tubes catalog and some application notes I asked. Personnaly, I'm not so sure that this conversion is such a good ideea: it's quite labor; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00057.html (7,919 bytes)
3. [AMPS] L-4B conversion to 3CX1200 (score: 1): Author: AB4RU@stc.net (Ron Hooper); Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:16:55 +0000; I agree also, If you had the drive to make a pair of them go, I dought the power supply would hold up in the Drake L4B. Go back with the 3-500's. Ron W4WA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/amp; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00064.html (8,152 bytes)
4. [AMPS] L-4B conversion to 3CX1200 (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 14:06:44 +0000; If my memory serves me correctly the 3CX1500 is a rather older tube than the 3CX1200 and the latter was announced at around the same time as the 3CX800. The original CQ article from October 1985 inc; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00065.html (8,607 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]