Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Loudenboomer\s+history\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Loudenboomer\s+history\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Loudenboomer History (score: 1): Author: nospam4me@juno.com (Skip S Isaham); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:43:28 EDT; Hello there, trivia time... I read the Loudenboomer stories with great interest. I'm under the opinion there were three or four different amplifiers made with the "Loudenboomer Label". One or two wer; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00205.html (8,044 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Loudenboomer History (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:03:38 -0700; Hi Skip and the group, I too have a LOUDENBOOMER MKII. One of those projects....well, you know! I thought it was an interesting little amp and quickly whipped up a WebPage for it at http://radiodan.c; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00209.html (10,267 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Loudenboomer history (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 09:36:33 +0100; Just to add to the confusion, there's a guy over here has recently (up to a couple of years ago - maybe even still does) manufacture an amp with sweep tubes that he calls and sells (sold) under the n; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00211.html (7,126 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Loudenboomer History (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 07:04:39 -0600 (MDT); Obviously Lee, W0AIW/W0AR, is the best source for info on this and when I saw him at Friedrichshafen this summer he was sharp as a tack. He even recalled minute details of a CQWW CW contest that I o; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00216.html (9,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]