Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Mission\s+Impossible\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Mission\s+Impossible\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:05:56 +0100; Gents, Having spent a full weekend listening to a multitude of LOUSY signals in the ARRL SSB contest I am inclined to say that this reflector is on a mission impossible. Things are getting worse no m; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00218.html (8,454 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:11:46 -0000; It was OK over here in the UK, but I was only on 10m. Signals from the USA were generally clean, but so many of them it was hard to find anywhere to operate. Signals from the East of my location wer; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00222.html (8,170 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: n1rj@pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 07:15:07 -0500; I've always been told that it's my "LOUSY" receiver that's causing the problem! 73, Roger -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative request; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00224.html (7,939 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: smidtca@sprint.ca (Carl Smidt); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 08:07:21 -0400; I agree fully, it was infuriating to have to endure splatter from the 'Big Guns', each covering more than 20KHz of smaller stations signals. They obviously were only interested in their own contest s; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00228.html (9,813 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:53:59 +0100; Exactly, You've got the receiver without the famous SB, "Splatter Blanker" ! Haven't you heard of it ? or was it BS.. ? :-) /Peter/SM2CEW -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submiss; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00229.html (8,380 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:15:24 -0000; I always understood the idea in these contests WAS to splatter, as that helped keep the frequency. Like having key clicks on CW. However, the rule is: 'If I interfere with your reception, it's becaus; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00231.html (8,661 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: w5aaw@orbitworld.net (Calvin Starr); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 09:46:25 -0600; This is a method practiced by some contesters to clear a frequency and prevent other stations from bothering them. They would not admit it just like they will not admit to having a broad signal but i; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00239.html (11,325 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 07:55:25 -0700; Peter - 'This has got to be an amplifier adjustment problem. The radios you mentioned are fairly clean. cheers. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00241.html (11,431 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:13:18 +0100; This is what puzzles me, but there is no doubt that "fine" radios can turn into mean machines if they are improperly adjusted. Many of the signals heard over the weekend had the sound to them that yo; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00251.html (10,045 bytes)
10. SV: [AMPS] Mission Impossible (score: 1): Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (sm5ki); Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 19:31:00 +0000; Hej Peter: In the TS950 two-tone test in QST 1/1991 distorsion is abt 42 dB below pep for 3rd order mods. Higher order mods are also very low. This was worst case measurment and on most bands it shou; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00265.html (12,090 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]