- 1. [AMPS] Modelling and its failures (score: 1)
- Author: fredfffff@hotmail.com (Fred Fliss)
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 06:09:49 GMT
- I do regret sounding as if I'm on a side here, but I must quite disagree with many comments regarding modelling. It is very much like selecting tools for the repair of your autobile. For some mechani
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00584.html (14,329 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Modelling and its failures (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:40:40 -0400
- Hi Fred, Which is my point. Please don't take what I say out of the context it was in. There is enough at that going on Fred. My points are: If you have an amplifier that arcs capacitors, blows bands
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00596.html (11,939 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Modelling and its failures (score: 1)
- Author: dhb@mediaone.net (Dave, AA6YQ)
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:19:45 -0400
- in planar Resistors are equally easy to measure, but resistor models are provided so that more complex circuits containing resistors can be modeled. The same should be true of solenoid inductors. Ha
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00666.html (8,782 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Modelling and its failures (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 21:17:01 -0400
- Hi Dave, Don't misquote me please. I said none of the programs I've seen work accurately to represent large inductors, and said I haven't seen all of them. own? I barely can use basic. All my own pro
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00671.html (8,318 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] Modelling and its failures (score: 1)
- Author: fredfffff@hotmail.com (Fred Fliss)
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 05:45:07 GMT
- Gents, I shall reply to two posts at once, and far more brief than my initiating exposition. Tom wrote (including my initial comments): I do not recall that you had written this, Tom. Somebody had, a
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00696.html (10,992 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu