Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+PEP\s+philosophy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+PEP\s+philosophy\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: rbigg@pcola.gulf.net (rb); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:22:02 -0600; <For the FCC PEP rule, Part 97.3 defines PEP as "The average power supplied to the antenna transmission line by a transmitter during one RF cycle at the crest of the modulation envelope taken under n; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00164.html (8,265 bytes)
2. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 01:57:00 -0000; Hi Ron K5BDJ & all - supplied the conditions."> a the FCC quote is correct - assuming, that is, the ARRL got it right. I copied and pasted it directly from their website The problem to me is not that; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00169.html (9,257 bytes)
3. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:05:23 -0000; average power supplied one RF cycle at the operating conditions."> The same wording is used in the UK licence - I guess it is an internationally agreed form of words that covers all situations. point; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00172.html (9,875 bytes)
4. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:10:46 +0000; The FCC quote is complete, accurate and consistent. It's also the same definition as is used in the UK. Just remember that the "Peak" in PEP means the peak of the *modulation* - not the peak of the R; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00173.html (9,580 bytes)
5. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:32:58 -0700; Indeed. PEP is not peak power, it is RMS power at the modulation peak. IOW, the limit is effectively 3000w peak, which is 3300w-p with the 10% FCC allowance. For those who are intent on exceeding th; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00174.html (10,224 bytes)
6. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 18:23:41 +0000; There's no such thing as "peak power" because the power must be averaged over the whole RF cycle. You can't go peak-pickin' within the cycle. 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Pract; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00179.html (8,642 bytes)
7. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: paab@gte.net (Paul and Abbi Elliott); Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 17:47:23 -0800; <There's no such thing as "peak power" because the power must be averaged <over the whole RF cycle. You can't go peak-pickin' within the cycle. I believe, trying to say it in words, that PEP is the a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00181.html (9,376 bytes)
8. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 01:27:07 -0700; Excellent. cheers, Jim. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00188.html (8,422 bytes)
9. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 09:29:48 -0000; So, are we talking about Peak Power (PP) here? Somehow everything seems to find its way back to the crapper. 73, Lu -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00190.html (9,476 bytes)
10. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 09:23:29 -1000; Gets more and more clear, or does it, PEP that is?? KH7M: Or, therefore........ 170v peak squared / R = peak watts ? I have one of the "new" RF Applications VFD VSWR/wattcmeters. Per the "technical d; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00192.html (11,371 bytes)
11. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 14:29:11 -0600; Bob Heil, "Mr. Audio" came down to our club a while back and made some very good suggestions. I preempt this by stating it is a necessity to be able to listen to yourself on the air (no, the built-i; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00193.html (9,624 bytes)
12. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:18:53 -0000; --Original Message-- From: measures <measures@vcnet.com> To: Ian White, G3SEK <G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 07 January 2000 17:31 Subject: Re; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00213.html (8,421 bytes)
13. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:12:04 -0600; Another question: Where is the "crest?" Phil, K5PC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problem; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00218.html (8,750 bytes)
14. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:52:38 -0000; I think I finally got straightened out on this thanks to several in the group that took the time to answer my questions in detail - and, I had quite a few questions. My next two emails to this group; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00223.html (10,555 bytes)
15. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:53:39 -0000; COPY OF EMAIL FROM IAN G3SEK TO ME FROM THE OTHER DAY: Hello Luther reply): You got it! It's probably much shorter than 1/10th of a second. The narrowest, highest peak could be at the upper frequency; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00224.html (15,033 bytes)
16. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:37:51 -0700; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.con; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00225.html (9,785 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]