Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+PI\-L\s+network\s+inductor\s+wire\s+sizes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+PI\-L\s+network\s+inductor\s+wire\s+sizes\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] PI-L network inductor wire sizes (score: 1): Author: JWebs3939@aol.com (JWebs3939@aol.com); Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 15:55:48 EST; In a PI-L output network, is the RF current the same or different in the PI inductor (L1) and the L inductor (L2) ? On the one hand, it would seem that the currents would be the same since the induct; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00279.html (7,943 bytes)
2. [AMPS] PI-L network inductor wire sizes (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 15:35:42 -0600; HI, L1 has much greater, internal circulating currents than L2 has. With typical loaded Q's, L1 could easily have ten times the current of L2. 73, K6XK PI since is a be conductor -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00280.html (9,005 bytes)
3. [AMPS] PI-L network inductor wire sizes (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 14:47:50 -0800; ? The circulating current in L1, the main tank coil is approx anode-current x Q (typ. 11A-rms). The current in L2 is the same as the current in the 50-ohm load. (typ 5.5A-rms). Rich... R. L. Measure; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00281.html (8,850 bytes)
4. [AMPS] PI-L network inductor wire sizes (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 01:18:25 -0500; Not likely. If the 50 Ohm current is 5-6A then there would not be any ham amps produced that would survive with 50-60A in L1. I would guess 2-3 times would be more in line with a good design. In my e; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00291.html (10,662 bytes)
5. [AMPS] PI-L network inductor wire sizes (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 10:35:31 -0600; Aren't you the feller who stated on here that a Q=50 was OK?? 73, K6XK --Original Message-- From: km1h@juno.com <km1h@juno.com> To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com>; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00302.html (11,905 bytes)
6. [AMPS] PI-L network inductor wire sizes (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:34:33 -0500; On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 10:35:31 -0600 "Roy Koeppe" <royanjoy@ncn.net> writes: You might want to try the question again within the proper context. Start with a frequency. 73 Carl KM1H ___________________; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00309.html (7,801 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]