Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Peak\s+reading\s+vs\s+True\s+peak\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Peak\s+reading\s+vs\s+True\s+peak\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:40:31 -0700; ? Tom is apparently talking about indicated anode current for a g-g triode, with the same amount of cathode drive, when anode supply volts decrease. . . - cheers Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00643.html (9,479 bytes)
22. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:43:32 +0100; Ah. Different interpretations. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owne; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00644.html (10,669 bytes)
23. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 99 09:50:56 -0500; That's what I always thought too: When you decrease plate voltage, plate current increases. I can see that on my amp when I drop the plate voltage with the variac. I draw more plate current. 73, Jon; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00645.html (9,665 bytes)
24. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 99 09:52:59 -0500; OK. I should have read Rich's reply to you, Peter before sending mine agreeing with you. Wait a minute: I think hell just froze. Rich Measures and Tom Rauch agreed on something! GRIN! 73, Jon KE9NA; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00646.html (9,333 bytes)
25. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 99 09:53:52 -0500; How much does gain typically get reduced by? 73, Jon KE9NA -- The Second Amendment is NOT about duck hunting! Jon Ogden jono@enteract.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00647.html (9,243 bytes)
26. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:00:30 +0100; I maintain that in grounded cathode, it doesn't. We have the complication here that I'm talking in terms of the plate swing during the RF cycle. As the grid goes positive, the plate current increases; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00648.html (10,115 bytes)
27. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:05:29 -0700; ? My guess is that we agree on more than he admits to in public. A persistent impediment seems to be in trying defend his statement regarding recognized amplifier experts in the Sept. 1994 *QST*. Ri; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00649.html (9,484 bytes)
28. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:05:31 -0700; ? Different situations. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00650.html (10,829 bytes)
29. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:12:59 -0700; ? With a g-g triode, somewhat proportionately. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00653.html (10,103 bytes)
30. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:27:56 -0700; ? semi-agreed -- and more so with a grid-driven pentode. ? Rejoice not. Other issues are likely to persist. Examples: 1. Denial that standard AC circuit analysis is valid for R/L VHF parasitic suppr; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00655.html (11,045 bytes)
31. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:38:18 -0400; The gain, in a grounded grid PA, is directly related to the driving impedance and output impedance of the stage. That is because the input is directly in series with the output, and 180 degrees out; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00659.html (11,583 bytes)
32. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:38:18 -0400; You are viewing short term fractional cycle behavior and trying to use it to explain long term averaged current and power. Anode current is maximum at minimum plate voltage because you are viewing th; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00660.html (10,796 bytes)
33. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:38:18 -0400; <color><param>0100,0100,0100</param>I don't selectively agree or disagree with anyone, including Rich. Things work the </color>way they work, and virtually every GOOD theory can be verified.<italic>; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00661.html (9,373 bytes)
34. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:55:30 -0600; Excellent! I just had somebody tell me to go there and I have had numerous charlatans tell me I am headed there and I like cooler temperatures.;) George K. Watson K0IW -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00662.html (9,137 bytes)
35. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan Gray); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:10:51 -0400; Heaven for climate, hell for society- Mark Twain --Original Message-- From: George K. Watson <watson@epiloglaser.com> To: 'W8JI@contesting.com' <W8JI@contesting.com>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com>; Jo; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00663.html (10,175 bytes)
36. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:10:32 +0100; --Original Message-- From: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> To: 'amps' <amps@contesting.com>; Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 24 June 1999 19:48 Subject: RE:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00669.html (9,971 bytes)
37. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:13:14 +0100; Yes. Just like Chaffee analysis does. But the original point was that the gain goes down. My argument is that the power output goes down, but the 'gain' is marginally affected. So what we see is gain; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00682.html (10,607 bytes)
38. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:47:49 -0700; ? [chortle] ? The gain of a SB-220 is about 9.5db on the low v tap, and about 11db on the high v tap. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00684.html (10,114 bytes)
39. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:25:48 +0100; At what power output? 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@co; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00686.html (11,458 bytes)
40. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 04:40:05 -0700; ? 390v-peak into 50-ohms on the high v tap, using SSB. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@conte; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00687.html (9,125 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]