Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Pi\-Net\s+math\s+Help\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Pi\-Net\s+math\s+Help\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Pi-Net math Help (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 01:17:01 -0700; ? Isn't there a loaded Q and an unloaded Q? ? Agreed. . And how much improvement do the new, improved formulas afford the user? Ian calculated 5.57 uH. I calculated 5.06uH using the old, less than p; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00129.html (10,258 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Pi-Net math Help (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:27:09 -0400; It appears there are two definitions, Q by Rich's definition and Q by IEEE definition, which can be measured either loaded or unloaded. Since Q=Quality that seems to fit. Rich's quality diodes come f; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00134.html (7,568 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]