- 1. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: dom@shocking.com (Ron Angle (AB6ZX))
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 23:36:41 -0700
- Following up on the excellent series "tuning your amp", I wish to present the following scenario. I am rebuilding a sixties-era homebrew amp running a pair of 4-400s in GG. The power supply is a full
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00150.html (8,441 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 97 04:53:51 -0800
- ....... There will be not much difference if the current is changed proportionately, Ron. 5kV at 800mA yields about the same RL as 2.5kV at 400mA--and a difference of 1 S-unit at the receiving end. -
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00151.html (8,936 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 11:48:15 +0000
- To: <amps@contesting.com> If your PA works OK at 2500 volts with full rated current it'll likely be just fine at the higher voltage, although tank losses will increase (especially on ten and 15 mete
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00152.html (8,279 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 12:42:51 EDT
- On Tue, 19 Aug 1997 23:36:41 -0700 "Ron Angle (AB6ZX)" <dom@shocking.com> writes: Is that a full wave or full wave bridge? I am hoping it is just a standard full wave with a center tap. In that case
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00153.html (10,312 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 17:44:05 +0000
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Not a good method in the real world. Inductance changes by the square of the turns if the inductor has 100% flux linkage from end to end. If it has no flux linking the turn
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00154.html (9,419 bytes)
- 6. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:09:45 EDT
- On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 17:44:05 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <amps@contesting.com> Maybe in your version of reality but not in the world the rest of us inhabit. The standard B&W
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00155.html (11,953 bytes)
- 7. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 22:13:54 +0000
- Carl, Your nasty index is rising, but there is one good technical point hidden inside: Anyone owning a GDO, a simple common antenna analyzer, or a transceiver and a low power SWR meter, and a few cap
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00157.html (10,320 bytes)
- 8. [AMPS] Q Swing (score: 1)
- Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner)
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 04:38:00 GMT
- If the goal is getting close to what you want, it would be MUCH better to calculate the values of caps. If you know that, by leaving the tube, choke and stuff disconnected, and putting a small silver
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-08/msg00158.html (9,494 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu