Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s*$/: 155 ]

Total 155 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: (score: 1): Author: no9z at soltec.net (Lynn); Date: Thu Apr 10 16:03:44 2003; The problem with the power supply occurs with a power output of around 500 watts.... i.e. less than 600 ma total current ( its a big tube with about 20 watts drive) 3cpx5000. I am using a full wave r; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00105.html (7,729 bytes)
2. [Amps] Re: (score: 1): Author: on4kj at skynet.be (on4kj); Date: Thu Apr 10 16:41:17 2003; And if the quality of the transformer is to high..... What would happen ? I think about transformers who were made to meet with vacuum rectifiers with High(er) rho. Jos on4kj; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00106.html (8,751 bytes)
3. [Amps] Re: (score: 1): Author: n2bc at stny.rr.com (Bill Coleman N2BC); Date: Thu Apr 10 19:36:26 2003; Lynn, 5KV @ 600mA is 3KW input. If you're only getting 500W out, I would suspect something amiss in the tank circuit. I'd expect 1500W to 1800W out with 3000W in. Just had a thought.... You say 20W d; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00109.html (9,178 bytes)
4. [Amps] Re: (score: 1): Author: doug at nc.rr.com (Doug Hall); Date: Thu Apr 10 19:41:09 2003; Is it possible that your transceiver is overshooting on key down? Many transceivers will briefly put out 100w or more for a short period of time even when the power level is turned down. 73, Doug, K4; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00110.html (8,582 bytes)
5. [Amps] Re: (score: 1): Author: K6KWQ at aol.com (K6KWQ@aol.com); Date: Thu Apr 10 21:49:30 2003; I had a similar problem here with my 2X 3cpx5000 amp on 80. I since went to 3 phase 480 vt primary and no longer have the problem. K6KWQ 12 volt radios are for sissies real radios can kill you. QRO?; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00112.html (6,413 bytes)
6. [Amps] Re: (score: 1): Author: n3ji at yahoo.com (Joe Isabella); Date: Fri Apr 11 09:58:09 2003; The '706 is one of them. If memory serves, Icom uses the ALC for power control and it takes a few mS to react. Aggrivating!! Joe __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yaho; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00115.html (10,278 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:55:00 -0800; Thanks, Tom, but I dont use 'em. - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative req; /archives//html/Amps/2001-12/msg00168.html (7,453 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 08:12:36 -0700; Who is "Paul"? thanks - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amp; /archives//html/Amps/2001-07/msg00337.html (6,338 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil (VA3UX)); Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:47:35 -0400; I have that article if you're looking for a copy Tom. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems:; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00379.html (7,654 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:50:14 -0800; chortle - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com P; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00153.html (6,451 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 11:10:21 -0800; Neat trick. I'd like to see the circuit. yuck yuck 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00157.html (7,215 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 09:03:27 -0700; What is the grid-resonant freq.? What is the anode-resonant freq.? cheers, John -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-R; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00010.html (7,310 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 08:10:26 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0081_01BF76C2.F31780C0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--=_NextPart_001_0082_01BF76C2.F320A880" --=_NextPart_001_0082_01BF; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00233.html (13,948 bytes)
14. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:27:19 -0000; Ron, K5BDJ, asks I'll stick my neck out a bit here. ALC as it is usually implemented is a bit like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. It can be done (but usually isn't) by looking a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00237.html (7,712 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:03:14 -0700; tuning, The trouble with ALC is onset overshoot due to un-avoidable built-in delay. A better solution is to not use ALC and to make the amplifier happy with the drive level by adding RF-NFB R at the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00246.html (8,790 bytes)
16. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:37:26 -0700; <rbigg@pcola.gulf.net>, "'amps'" <amps@contesting.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: owner-amps@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO &; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00247.html (7,180 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 21:40:28 -0700; "Circuit Improvements for the TL-922 Amplifier". the article is on my Web site. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-R; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00564.html (8,089 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 05:57:29 -0700; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.con; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00002.html (6,661 bytes)
19. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites); Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:13:30 -0500; Sounds like RF is getting into the 430. Suggest you check the mike ground and try adding ferrite on mike cord. Are you using anything like a voice keyer between the mike and the rig? Have had some pr; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00006.html (9,278 bytes)
20. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: RichyRusso@aol.com (RichyRusso@aol.com); Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 01:31:04 EST; << ust got my Kenwood SM-220 monitor scope hooked up and running to keep an eye on my exciter and final signal quality. Which display do I use, and what do I look for to detect rf feedback in the sig; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00105.html (7,724 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]