Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s*$/: 155 ]

Total 155 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil T. (VA3UX)); Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 23:23:49 -0500; No I didn't ! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: h; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00101.html (7,047 bytes)
22. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: qrotec@bright.net (QRO Technologies); Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 21:57:58 -0500; Multi-Tech Industries (Radio Switch) if you got deep pockets. 73's Ray C. KB8VU QRO Tech anymore? if -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrat; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00520.html (8,015 bytes)
23. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 17:59:13 -0800; Hi Rich, I haven't actually tried the faster speeds to see what differences there would be in the final outcome. I usually just leave the keyer where it was last. This would be a good test to try to; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00000.html (9,160 bytes)
24. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 16:50:36 -1000; Ok, while recovering from my "hunting trip" this weekend (for rare picks during CQ WW), I will fiddle with dit speeds during tune up, then VFD readings using SSB modulation. All into the Bird dummy; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00001.html (8,119 bytes)
25. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:49:41 -0600; There is a pulser you can buy called the "Cricket" I believe. You'll find it advertised in QST. Better yet, you can build one from plans on AG6K's website: www.vcnet.com/measures Rich's circuit works; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00004.html (7,869 bytes)
26. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:38:36 -0700; Technical aspects aside, it sounds as though you are trying to put these extremely overpower, illegal and dangerous CBers a class with those Ham Radio operators who run between a little to quite a b; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00465.html (8,351 bytes)
27. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: n1rj@pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 10:44:14 -0500; In it's other life, mine is called a keyer. 73, Roger -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Probl; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00692.html (6,617 bytes)
28. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 08:55:13 -0700; Some folks use keyers sending dits at c. 50wpm. They switch on and off at around 30 times per second. You can easily build one. A 30% duty-cycle pulser diagram is on my Web site. The circuit is not; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00693.html (7,714 bytes)
29. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 13:49:22 -0800; Hi Ron, Don't bother with these devices, just use your keyer that is already hooked up for CW use. Set it for a 35 WPM string of ditz and tune up. Some wattmeters are not fast enough to follow quick; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00698.html (8,766 bytes)
30. [AMPS] RE: (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 15:40:16 -0700; 35wpm dits are too slow to dampen ordinary meters. 50wpm - 55wpm is usally fast enough. With some radios, 60wpm does not allow full pep to reached before the dit ends. . - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00701.html (7,268 bytes)
31. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 15:53:37 -0700; Thanks for the tip, John. However, buyers need to be aware that there are two types of pulsers: the audio-type and the keyer switch type. The audio-type couples through the mic. jack. For a correct; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00702.html (9,065 bytes)
32. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: User312627@aol.com (User312627@aol.com); Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 17:26:48 EDT; time for the measurement. If the modulation is a pure sine wave, one only needs one-half a cycle of time to make the measurement. Most of the time, in practice the sine wave contains harmonics and di; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00007.html (7,743 bytes)
33. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: User312627@aol.com (User312627@aol.com); Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 18:01:42 EDT; peak-reading circuits..... Amen What is needed is a careful design of the filters associated with the meter output. Suppose one stacked two time-constants with one having a 0.1 second tau and another; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00010.html (7,545 bytes)
34. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: User312627@aol.com (User312627@aol.com); Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 18:09:29 EDT; sense in applying the definition to real world systems seems to be lacking. I agree one hundred percent! Bill KB7YUM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00011.html (7,088 bytes)
35. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:49:01 +0100; Most peak-reading circuits do attempt to create this dual time constant. The two problems are the charging rate of the capacitors, and excessively long discharge times. First, the modulation peak tha; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00022.html (9,591 bytes)
36. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (Mike Willis); Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:20:47 +0100; It rather depends what you consider useful. The 43P circuit takes forever to fall back and just sits at the maximum reading when used with SSB. This is good in contests as it stops the operator cont; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00023.html (8,081 bytes)
37. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:45:41 -0500; For those of us not so technically inclined, RF Applications has done all of the suggestions below for us, even for Bird line sections. They even factory modified my P-3000 to 5 kw. By the time you b; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00025.html (9,249 bytes)
38. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:08:26 -0700; ? Peak Envelope Power is the RMS value of peak voltage, squared, divided by R. . PEP is not a measurement of average power. It is a measurement of RMS power. ? There are two voltage peaks in one RF; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00045.html (8,392 bytes)
39. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 00:47:35 -0700; My guess is they are talking about input watts. Electrically, the 6JE6 is way different. peak cathode emission has a lot to do with pep output. You need a calibrated scope and hv multiplier probe to; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00462.html (9,778 bytes)
40. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 09:25:27 +0100; A lot depends on the HV. At about 1kV, the FL1000 with 4 6JS6s did about 1kW in, about 500 watts out - but not for long transmissions! It had a tiny fan that stirred the air. 6JS6's would do thermal; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00465.html (8,193 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]