Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s+Phase\s+noise\s+and\s+IMD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s+Phase\s+noise\s+and\s+IMD\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] RE: Phase noise and IMD (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 10:13:38 +0100; Now if the PIN diodes were correctly chosen in the first place (long recovery time) and are biased correctly, their contribution to the rx IMD performance will be negligible - in spite of various rum; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00078.html (10,022 bytes)
2. [AMPS] RE: Phase noise and IMD (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 10:26:26 -0400; I can't understand the fascination with changing PIN diodes Peter. While I suppose it's possible for a manufacturer to have selected flawed diodes, I suspect the most common performance increases ob; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00089.html (10,427 bytes)
3. [AMPS] RE: Phase noise and IMD (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 16:01:55 +0100; Could be ringing in the narrow filter. Because the signal is outside the passband, ringing generated by a transient in the first crystal could appear as a narrow burst of energy - i.e. a click. Narro; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00090.html (8,268 bytes)
4. [AMPS] RE: Phase noise and IMD (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 3 Jun 99 10:32:32 -0500; Tom, Do you have any documentation (schematics, parts list, etc) for these mods so that the rest of us can perform them? 73, Jon KE9NA -- The Second Amendment is NOT about duck hunting! Jon Ogden jo; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00092.html (7,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]