Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+2m\s+legal\s+limit\s+amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+2m\s+legal\s+limit\s+amps\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 17:17:19 EDT; On Sat, 19 Jul 1997 16:05:42 +0100 Ian White <G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk> writes: That was not what I asked Ian and I am sure that you know that. I think it would be safe to assume that a reduction in; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00166.html (17,534 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White); Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 23:02:22 +0100; Hello Carl I'm not trying to evade your question, Carl. Give me time to talk this though with GW4FRX and I *will* come back to you and the group this time. (It may take a few days, depending on what; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00167.html (9,639 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 06:18:21 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Carl, First let me say I agree with Ian. Screen regulation is important, as well as adding a little negative feedback via an unbypassed cathode resistor. You can do IMD; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00176.html (10,186 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White); Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 07:32:38 +0100; Barry, K8SD asked: Yes, a ZL has tried it and it does work, though the benefits are not as great as for 2C39s. I think that's basically because the 2C39 cross-flow air cooler is rather ineffective, l; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00177.html (9,000 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:09:16 EDT; On Tue, 22 Jul 1997 20:15:30 -0500 Barry Arneson <barneson@willinet.net> writes: Hi Barry, The 2C39 family has removable anode readiators which makes them easily adaptable to water cooling. I use a p; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00181.html (21,628 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 18:40:54 EDT; On Wed, 23 Jul 1997 06:18:21 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <amps@contesting.com> Ian and I have agreed on the screen supply since our first chat a year ago. The problem with t; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00187.html (13,089 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 22:17:37 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> OK, that would be understandable because of phase shift due to stray C. The IMD will be well above the phase noise level. The main problem is shielding and having an accurat; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00196.html (11,140 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White); Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 18:26:59 +0100; It looks like GW4FRX can make some more measurements of IMD to answer your question more specifically, Carl. What he proposes to do is: 1. Set up 2*4CX250R with Va 1500V, Vg2 350V and adjust Vg2 to; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00216.html (14,203 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 17:57:32 EDT; On Fri, 25 Jul 1997 18:26:59 +0100 Ian White <G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk> writes: Why on earth do you want to vary screen voltage Ian? That sounds like one of Rich's ideas but is not real world practi; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00217.html (20,024 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 00:29:18 +0100; Carl (>) wrote in reply to me (>>): Whoops, sorry, t6ping error on my part - I meant to type "adjust Vg1". Vg2 will be set to EIMAC's datasheet value and left there. A great deal of the rest of your; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00226.html (14,818 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Re: 2m legal limit amps (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 11:59:34 EDT; Hi Ian...OK on the Gremlin in your typing! Looking foreward to your results. 73....Carl KM1H -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reque; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00230.html (7,990 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]