Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Blower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Blower\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: Blower (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:25:50 -0000; Now, Frank, we can't have this. Everyone knows that tubes are fragile, unreliable, wear out, etc. That's why we have semiconductors!! 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.ht; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00001.html (6,495 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: Blower (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 21:30:27 -0500; But I can still remember Frank as a teenager ( K1LPL) when he couldnt even afford 6146's ! Now he makes enough money to buy anything but still maintains his NE frugality....way to go buddy! You were; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00045.html (8,089 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: Blower (score: 1): Author: donovanf@erols.com (Frank Donovan W3LPL); Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 08:13:18 -0500; Hi Dave, Three of my 3-1000Z amps use an older Dayton equivalent of the 2870 rpm 4C443, the other three amps use the equivalent of the 3160 rpm 4C446. The 4C443 is significantly quieter than the 4C44; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00698.html (9,143 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: Blower (score: 1): Author: LOMAX1@prodigy.net (frank ayers jr); Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:48:08 -0500; I've used a 4C006 and it's fine, although the back pressure is.65 in so I have no idea what would happen if it were lower. Another interesting looking one is the 2C646 - 12v motor 1875 RPM and cut o; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00703.html (7,310 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]