- 1. [AMPS] Re: Continuos Duty Amp (score: 1)
- Author: n2ckh@cybercomm.net (Steve Hajducek)
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 13:22:30 -0300
- In my opinion buy surplus. If you really want a work horse and have the room forget the amateur desktop amps and get a used commercial or military amplifier that can loaf at 1500w out. Don't get me w
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00029.html (8,935 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Re: Continuos Duty Amp (score: 1)
- Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 14:15:13 -0700
- ? When a dyed in the wool contestor/dxer talks about ''loafing at 1500W'' he is usually talking about ZSAC watts. cheers - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00040.html (8,056 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Re: Continuos Duty Amp (score: 1)
- Author: n2ckh@cybercomm.net (Steve Hajducek)
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 18:01:02 -0300
- For what it's worth, the zero-signal anode-current or idling current on my 204F for a pair of 4CX1000A operating Class AB1 at 20% of rated anode current has it sitting there drawing 2.5Kw of primary
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00043.html (9,061 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Re: Continuos Duty Amp (score: 1)
- Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 15:19:04 -0700
- excellent later, Steve - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@c
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00044.html (9,235 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] Re: Continuos Duty Amp (score: 1)
- Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 18:10:13 -0500
- ? When a dyed in the wool contestor/dxer talks about ''loafing at 1500W'' he is usually talking about ZSAC watts. cheers - Rich Woe be unto the guy with good intentions that stops by the contester's
- /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00045.html (7,004 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu