Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+G2DAF\s+\-\s+Hearing\s+is\s+Believing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+G2DAF\s+\-\s+Hearing\s+is\s+Believing\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: G2DAF - Hearing is Believing (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 07:33:50 +0200; This has been my point the whole time! Nice that someone else also can understand. What I probably been after the whole time is why G2DAF seems to work just fine with G2DAF and it there are other tub; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00974.html (10,249 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: G2DAF - Hearing is Believing (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 06:32:41 -0600; It's probably that they were running at max processor! I had one guy come to me on 15 and tell me I was really wide (like 10 Kcs down). I back off my processor and mike gain and he said my signal imp; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00985.html (7,832 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: G2DAF - Hearing is Believing (score: 1): Author: warrenw@pentek.com (Warren J. Walsh); Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 07:37:32 -0500; I would be happy to know how we sounded, especially if we were causing any kind of splatter. We were using my call K2BM from the N2RM station. We were using standard commercial GG amps. 73 Warren Wal; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00986.html (8,130 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]